Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Noisy BINDTONONE SET #1496

Closed
wckzhang opened this issue Sep 7, 2022 · 4 comments
Closed

Noisy BINDTONONE SET #1496

wckzhang opened this issue Sep 7, 2022 · 4 comments

Comments

@wckzhang
Copy link
Contributor

wckzhang commented Sep 7, 2022

We are seeing a noisy BINDTONONE SET output on each run:

    if (PRTE_BIND_TO_NONE == options->bind) {                                                                           
        prte_output(0, "BINDTONONE SET");                                                                               
        options->target = NULL;                                                                                         
        avail = true;                                                                                                   
        goto done;                                                                                                      
    }

I don't think this should be output by default. Are there verbosity guidelines I can refer to?
@rhc54
Copy link
Contributor

rhc54 commented Sep 7, 2022

It's just some leftover debug - go ahead and remove it

@wckzhang
Copy link
Contributor Author

wckzhang commented Sep 7, 2022

PR - #1497

@wckzhang
Copy link
Contributor Author

wckzhang commented Sep 7, 2022

3.0 backport PR - #1498

@wckzhang
Copy link
Contributor Author

wckzhang commented Sep 8, 2022

Resolving

@wckzhang wckzhang closed this as completed Sep 8, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@rhc54 @wckzhang