Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Propose changes to Goods and Services attracting Standard Rate of VAT #38

Merged
merged 2 commits into from Jan 29, 2014

Conversation

PaulJRobinson
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request has been automatically generated by prose.io.

@Floppy
Copy link
Member

Floppy commented Jan 7, 2014

Should this be set based on some average-price stat? Many things are now wrong because a fixed threshold was set, not linked to real prices. Stamp duty, for instance. Retail price index, perhaps?

@philipjohn
Copy link
Member

"It should be possible for the poorest households to fully equip themselves without ever being subject to paying VAT." I've long thought the best way to do this is actually to completely eradicate VAT and switch to income Tax with a living wage threshold. That way, only those who can afford to, pay tax including VAT. I.e. the central aim would be to ensure that you never pay any tax (within reason) before you've earned a living wage. Anything less is a contradiction - adopting the living wage but then taking away from it.

@PaulJRobinson
Copy link
Contributor Author

The levying of VAT on goods and services is a compulsory requirement of our membership of the EU - just one of many reasons why I back the 'better-off-out' campaign. We couldn't abolish VAT even if we wanted to.

@PaulJRobinson
Copy link
Contributor Author

But I do agree with @philipjohnon the principle that no-one should pay any tax on anything earned below the living wage. Although there is an argument for suggesting that everyone should feel that they have a 'stake' in the system by having contributed at least something towards it, I don't believe it overrides the argument for taking the poorest entirely out of the tax system.

@Floppy
Copy link
Member

Floppy commented Jan 8, 2014

Maybe we can put in a middle ground then; say we can adjust VAT to make it less regressive, but also campaign for it to be removed from our EU requirements. I agree that a pure income tax would be much more sensible.

@Floppy
Copy link
Member

Floppy commented Jan 8, 2014

There's nothing wrong with policy saying where we want to go, even if it's currently impossible, as long as we acknowledge the changes required to get there.

@Floppy
Copy link
Member

Floppy commented Jan 9, 2014

@PaulJRobinson do you reckon you can make a few adjustments to this PR, or does prose.io make that too complex? If prose doesn't make it simple, you can just hit edit on https://github.com/PaulJRobinson/manifesto/blob/prose-patch-10/economy.md and do it there instead, and it will automatically appear in here.

@PaulJRobinson
Copy link
Contributor Author

Happy to. But if I go back to the site to edit it using prose.io I am presented with the existing Master to edit, not my first draft. How/Where would I find my first draft in order to edit that? And are we agreed that my edit should be "Investigate possible reforms to the way VAT is applied to goods and services with a view to making it less regressive and, ultimately, to remove the poorest from having to pay entirely - even if this requires renegotiating our obligations to the EU."

@PaulJRobinson
Copy link
Contributor Author

Forget that. If you're happy with the quotation above, I'll just add it using prose.io the way I did before and lose my first draft.

@Floppy
Copy link
Member

Floppy commented Jan 9, 2014

Yeah, fairly happy with that. If you follow the github link in the comment up above, you can edit your draft without having to open a new PR.

@Floppy
Copy link
Member

Floppy commented Jan 29, 2014

👍 from me with new wording

@timcowlishaw
Copy link
Contributor

A big 👍 to all of this.

@Floppy Floppy merged commit a09e410 into openpolitics:gh-pages Jan 29, 2014
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants