Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Accountability of elected representatives #608

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Jun 22, 2017
Merged

Accountability of elected representatives #608

merged 1 commit into from Jun 22, 2017

Conversation

ghost
Copy link

@ghost ghost commented Jun 14, 2017

If you've pissed off 30% of people in your constituency to the point that they're willing to sign a petition against you continuing your role, you're probably doing a terrible job, though I'm up for debating the exact numbers.

@openpolitics-bot
Copy link
Member

This proposal is open for discussion and voting. If you are a contributor to this repository (and not the proposer), you may vote on whether or not it is accepted.

How to vote

Vote by entering one of the following symbols in a comment on this pull request. Only your last vote will be counted, and you may change your vote at any time until the change is accepted or closed.

vote symbol type this points
Yes :white_check_mark: 1
No :negative_squared_cross_mark: -1
Abstain 🤐 :zipper_mouth_face: 0
Block 🚫 :no_entry_sign: -1000

Proposals will be accepted and merged once they have a total of 2 points when all votes are counted. Votes will be open for a minimum of 7 days, but will be closed if the proposal is not accepted after 90.

Votes are counted automatically here, and results are set in the merge status checks below.

Changes

@Autumn-Leah, if you want to make further changes to this proposal, you can do so by clicking on the pencil icons here. If a change is made to the proposal, no votes cast before that change will be counted, and votes must be recast.

@Xyleneb
Copy link
Contributor

Xyleneb commented Jun 14, 2017

I think it's worth giving a constitutional protection or two a try.

Vote: ✅

You can always debate the numbers later. I could see a few other issues with it:
Politicians that do unpopular things might otherwise redeem themselves. Legislation like this is weak unless you list penalties for not adhering. Petitions, particularly electronic ones are susceptible to forgery.

The second one is probably the most critical. The rest are debates you could probably have as the need arose.

@simonneb
Copy link

I guess there is a risk if the % is too low that you could get caught in a continual cycle of elections with two sides vetoing each others candidates constantly. Con and Lab both got 40% of the GE vote. maybe a threshold above 50% would be better?

🤐

@philipjohn
Copy link
Member

Vote: ✅

@Floppy
Copy link
Member

Floppy commented Jun 15, 2017

I agree, but we already have a statement on recall on the elections page. This is better and has more detail, but we need to match them up. See https://openpolitics.org.uk/manifesto/elections.html#recall-of-representatives

@openpolitics-bot openpolitics-bot merged commit ec904bd into openpolitics:master Jun 22, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants