Add missing type annotation to loop variable in for loop examples #521
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
In several examples of `for` loops in the language specification there is no annotation, or type specification on the loop variable. According to the spec omitting the annotation is not allowed. This commit corrects each such instance by adding an annotation.
hodgestar
approved these changes
Apr 3, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
In several examples of
forloops in the language specification there is no annotation, or type specification, on the loop variable. According to the spec omitting the annotation is not allowed.This commit corrects each such instance by adding an annotation.
TODO
Done
This will need a release note. I'll add one if and when it looks like this will be merged.