Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

FIX: implement more robust angle_res retrieval #118

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Jun 16, 2023

Conversation

kmuehlbauer
Copy link
Collaborator

@kmuehlbauer kmuehlbauer commented Jun 15, 2023

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 15, 2023

Codecov Report

Merging #118 (4660b50) into main (e464ac7) will increase coverage by 0.00%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #118   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   88.17%   88.18%           
=======================================
  Files          19       19           
  Lines        3333     3335    +2     
=======================================
+ Hits         2939     2941    +2     
  Misses        394      394           
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 88.18% <100.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files Coverage Δ
xradar/util.py 97.31% <100.00%> (+0.03%) ⬆️

Copy link
Collaborator

@mgrover1 mgrover1 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This looks good to me!

@kmuehlbauer kmuehlbauer merged commit 1e09e4f into openradar:main Jun 16, 2023
12 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

possible bug with angle reindexing (?)
2 participants