Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix: Loggers should be named for their enclosing classes should not replace calls to getClass() #104

Conversation

pstreef
Copy link
Contributor

@pstreef pstreef commented May 6, 2023

fixes: #101

Do not remove getClass() when creating logger if the enclosing class is abstract

Do not remove `getClass()` when creating logger if the enclosing class is abstract
Copy link

@rpau rpau left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@timtebeek timtebeek added the bug Something isn't working label May 6, 2023
@timtebeek
Copy link
Contributor

Great! Thanks for the quick work on this; will merge as soon as the build completes. After your first contribution I won't have to approve your CI runs anymore, which also helps speed up the feedback.

@timtebeek timtebeek merged commit 97b8e64 into openrewrite:main May 6, 2023
1 check passed
@pstreef pstreef deleted the bugfix/issue-103-getclass-replaced-on-abstract-classes branch May 6, 2023 20:54
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
Archived in project
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Loggers should be named for their enclosing classes should not replace calls to getClass()
3 participants