You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I think we should limit access to people who are logged into google at least. Ideally, people would request access and then be allowed in. Is there good reason to allow anonymous changes?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Yes, there's a very good reason for allowing open changes: so that anyone can go in and contribute and see their work in real time.. But for this project, unlike SavMaps, the level of technical expertise needed to format the new entries properly is most likely above the skillset of the average user. That said, the participants, who learned the process at the event, said they were eager to go home and add new data as they think of it.
We can find approaches to keep it easy to contribute while still requiring a login. Reverting gets messy quickly when there are some good and some bad edits. Putting people's names by their changes gives them some ownership, personal pride in, and responsibility for the result.
The README top line can include an email address- yall@ or similar- that people should reach out to for access.
I think we should limit access to people who are logged into google at least. Ideally, people would request access and then be allowed in. Is there good reason to allow anonymous changes?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: