Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Enable reading of Carboncycle output #85

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jul 24, 2018
Merged

Conversation

rgieseke
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@rgieseke rgieseke requested a review from znicholls July 24, 2018 09:15
@rgieseke
Copy link
Member Author

@NortonAlex You can try installing this with (requires likely pip > 10.0):

pip install git+https://github.com/openclimatedata/pymagicc.git@refs/pull/85/merge

@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented Jul 24, 2018

Codecov Report

Merging #85 into master will decrease coverage by 0.46%.
The diff coverage is 33.33%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master      #85      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   95.18%   94.72%   -0.47%     
==========================================
  Files           3        3              
  Lines         395      398       +3     
  Branches       55       56       +1     
==========================================
+ Hits          376      377       +1     
- Misses         11       12       +1     
- Partials        8        9       +1
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
pymagicc/api.py 93.75% <33.33%> (-1.16%) ⬇️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 8ad959a...b3c7c56. Read the comment docs.

@NortonAlex
Copy link

NortonAlex commented Jul 24, 2018 via email

@rgieseke rgieseke merged commit 2b61f79 into master Jul 24, 2018
@rgieseke rgieseke deleted the read-carboncycle-output branch July 24, 2018 11:36
@rgieseke rgieseke mentioned this pull request Jul 24, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants