Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Textual issue in Song 6:12 #42

Open
joeldruark opened this issue Dec 12, 2017 · 3 comments
Open

Textual issue in Song 6:12 #42

joeldruark opened this issue Dec 12, 2017 · 3 comments

Comments

@joeldruark
Copy link

There is an ambiguity in the text of Song of Songs 6:12, regarding the final two words, עמּי־נדיב. In the OSHB text these are two lemmas, although perhaps there should be three lemmas instead. The LXX and the KJV translate both these words as a single proper name, "Aminadab" and "Amminadib", respectively. However, the NRSV and NIV both translate these as common words: either [H5971a+1cs suffix and H5081] or [H5971b+1cs suffix and H5081]. I prefer the NIV reading, i.e. H5971a+1cs suffix and H5081, yielding either "royals chariots of my people" or perhaps "chariots of my royal people". If we take either of the more modern readings, the pronominal suffix will need to be separated from the noun and marked with its own lemma.

@DavidTroidl
Copy link
Member

I have "chariots of my noble people." We don't list lemmas for pronominal suffixes, see "my soul" in the same verse. The morphological division in the word is something we would have to submit to the Groves Center, to get it changed in the WLC first.

@DavidTroidl
Copy link
Member

I have submitted the issue.

@DavidTroidl
Copy link
Member

I apologize for keeping you hanging on this issue. The Groves Center won't approve the change, but wants to list it as an alternative, when they have that capability. I discussed a solution with Andy. Hopefully it will be implemented soon.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants