Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update field mapping documentation for Security Analytics #2422

Merged
merged 14 commits into from
Jan 23, 2023

Conversation

cwillum
Copy link
Contributor

@cwillum cwillum commented Jan 17, 2023

Signed-off-by: cwillum cwmmoore@amazon.com

Description

Field mappings steps for detection creation have been separated into two tables: pending and default field mappings. This needs to be updated in documentation and the functionality of this step needs to be updated and clarified in general.

Issues Resolved

This update better clarifies the purpose of this step and the configuration of field mappings. This also updates the documentation to cover the two types of fields: pending and default.

Checklist

  • By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license and subject to the Developers Certificate of Origin.
    For more information on following Developer Certificate of Origin and signing off your commits, please check here.

Signed-off-by: cwillum <cwmmoore@amazon.com>
@cwillum cwillum added 1 - Backlog Issue: The issue is unassigned or assigned but not started v2.5.0 'Issues and PRs related to version v2.5.0' Needs SME Waiting on input from subject matter expert labels Jan 17, 2023
@cwillum cwillum added this to the v2.5.x milestone Jan 17, 2023
@cwillum cwillum self-assigned this Jan 17, 2023
@cwillum cwillum requested a review from a team as a code owner January 17, 2023 22:40
@cwillum
Copy link
Contributor Author

cwillum commented Jan 17, 2023

I created this PR to address the requirement for 1.2 in issue #2400 (the other updates to docs are complete). I need to speak with an SME to understand the purpose of these mappings and get more context. @AWSHurneyt appears to be out today. The 2.5 release is slated for 1/19/23. If I can't find another SME for explanation, we can handle this update after the release.

Signed-off-by: cwillum <cwmmoore@amazon.com>
@@ -36,11 +36,12 @@ Defining a new detector involves naming the detector, selecting a data source an

## Step 2. Make field mappings

Field mapping matches field names for the rule with field names from the log being used to provide data. The mappings are automatically applied once the detector is defined in previous steps. This page offers the user the option to map log-specific field names to the internal rule field names.
The field mapping step matches field names for the rule with field names for the log index being used to provide data. Correctly mapping the log field names with rule field names allows the system to accurately convey event data from the log to the detector and then use the data for triggering alerts.
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nit: field names from the rules with field names from the log

@Naarcha-AWS Naarcha-AWS added 2 - In progress Issue/PR: The issue or PR is in progress. 3 - Tech review PR: Tech review in progress and removed 1 - Backlog Issue: The issue is unassigned or assigned but not started 2 - In progress Issue/PR: The issue or PR is in progress. Needs SME Waiting on input from subject matter expert 3 - Tech review PR: Tech review in progress labels Jan 19, 2023
Signed-off-by: cwillum <cwmmoore@amazon.com>
Signed-off-by: cwillum <cwmmoore@amazon.com>
Signed-off-by: cwillum <cwmmoore@amazon.com>
@cwillum cwillum added 3 - Tech review PR: Tech review in progress and removed 2 - In progress Issue/PR: The issue or PR is in progress. labels Jan 20, 2023
@cwillum
Copy link
Contributor Author

cwillum commented Jan 20, 2023

@AWSHurneyt @Naarcha-AWS
@petardz Thanks for taking a first stab at this update for field mappings. I returned to it and made changes based on our conversation yesterday. Could you have a look at what I've done here and add any comments if you see something that looks/sounds funny or may not be accurate. Thanks!
@opensearch-project/security-analytics Or anyone on the team, could someone have a look at this for technical accuracy? Thanks.

@cwillum cwillum added the 4 - Doc review PR: Doc review in progress label Jan 20, 2023
{: .tip }

1. In the **Detector schedule** section, set how often the detector will run. Specify a unit of time and a corresponding number to set the interval.
1. Select the **Next** button in the lower-right corner of the screen to continue. The Configure field mapping page appears.

## Step 2. Make field mappings

Field mapping matches field names for the rule with field names from the log being used to provide data. The mappings are automatically applied once the detector is defined in previous steps. This page offers the user the option to map log-specific field names to the internal rule field names.
The field mapping step matches field names from the rule with field names from the log index being used to provide data. Correctly mapping the log field names with rule field names allows the system to accurately convey event data from the log to the detector and then use the data for triggering alerts.
Copy link
Contributor

@alicejw1 alicejw1 Jan 20, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

suggestion:

To trigger alerts, the log event data needs to be mapped to the detector. The field mapping step maps the log field names from the index that provides the data with the rule field names to set up detectors to trigger alerts.

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Agree with Alice. I would just change the second sentence to "Creating field mappings maps the log field names..."

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good. Thanks.

Once you navigate to the Configure field mapping page, the system attempts to automatically map fields between the two sources. Those field names that are not automatically mapped appear in the **Pending field mapping** table. In this table you can manually map rule fields to log fields.
<br><img src="{{site.url}}{{site.baseurl}}/images/Security/pending-mappings.png" alt="Field mapping example for pending mappings" width="900">

This process requires that the user or administrator have some familiarity with the field names in the log index and an understanding of the data contained in those fields. Rule fields are named to promote their standardization and normalize them in the industry, and the names themselves are typically self explanatory. If a user has an understanding of the log data contained in a particular log field, the mapping is typically a simple and straightforward process.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

maybe change "the user" to "you" ?
"If you have an understanding . . . "

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Agree with Alice. Also,
This process requires you to have some familiarity...
Also, not sure what "promote their standardization and normalize them in the industry" means in this context. Can we say "Rule fields are named according to industry standards"?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good suggestions. Thanks.

Copy link
Contributor

@alicejw1 alicejw1 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice work!

Copy link
Contributor

@AWSHurneyt AWSHurneyt left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

These changes look good to me, thank you!

Copy link
Contributor

@ariamarble ariamarble left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Copy link
Collaborator

@kolchfa-aws kolchfa-aws left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM. Left some comments.

@@ -28,21 +28,41 @@ Defining a new detector involves naming the detector, selecting a data source an
* Use the **Log type**, **Rule severity**, and **Source** dropdown menus to filter the rules you want to select from.
* Use the **Search** bar to search for specific rules.

To quickly select one or more known rules and dismiss others, first deselect all rules by moving the **rule name** toggle to the left, then search for your target rule names and select each individually by moving its toggle to the right.
To quickly select one or more known rules and dismiss others, first deselect all rules by moving the **Rule name** toggle to the left, then search for your target rule names and select each individually by moving its toggle to the right.
{: .tip }

1. In the **Detector schedule** section, set how often the detector will run. Specify a unit of time and a corresponding number to set the interval.
1. Select the **Next** button in the lower-right corner of the screen to continue. The Configure field mapping page appears.

## Step 2. Make field mappings
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Maybe "Create field mappings"?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

oh and remember our style change to use gerunds for all section headings? So could be
"Creating field mappings" then

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think it's ok without gerunds because it says "step 2".

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Agree with Fanit: we are standardizing gerunds are for the TOC/nav pane.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

thanks: create field mappings. and, yes, imperative voice for instruction: do this, do that.

{: .tip }

1. In the **Detector schedule** section, set how often the detector will run. Specify a unit of time and a corresponding number to set the interval.
1. Select the **Next** button in the lower-right corner of the screen to continue. The Configure field mapping page appears.

## Step 2. Make field mappings

Field mapping matches field names for the rule with field names from the log being used to provide data. The mappings are automatically applied once the detector is defined in previous steps. This page offers the user the option to map log-specific field names to the internal rule field names.
The field mapping step matches field names from the rule with field names from the log index being used to provide data. Correctly mapping the log field names with rule field names allows the system to accurately convey event data from the log to the detector and then use the data for triggering alerts.
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Agree with Alice. I would just change the second sentence to "Creating field mappings maps the log field names..."

Once you navigate to the Configure field mapping page, the system attempts to automatically map fields between the two sources. Those field names that are not automatically mapped appear in the **Pending field mapping** table. In this table you can manually map rule fields to log fields.
<br><img src="{{site.url}}{{site.baseurl}}/images/Security/pending-mappings.png" alt="Field mapping example for pending mappings" width="900">

This process requires that the user or administrator have some familiarity with the field names in the log index and an understanding of the data contained in those fields. Rule fields are named to promote their standardization and normalize them in the industry, and the names themselves are typically self explanatory. If a user has an understanding of the log data contained in a particular log field, the mapping is typically a simple and straightforward process.
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Agree with Alice. Also,
This process requires you to have some familiarity...
Also, not sure what "promote their standardization and normalize them in the industry" means in this context. Can we say "Rule fields are named according to industry standards"?

{: .note }

* The Rule field name column lists field names based on the selected log type and the rules that have been assigned to the detector.
* The log field name column includes a dropdown menu for each of the rule fields. Each dropdown menu contains a list of field names extracted from the log index.
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Our style guide says "dropdown list"

Suggested change
* The log field name column includes a dropdown menu for each of the rule fields. Each dropdown menu contains a list of field names extracted from the log index.
* The log field name column includes a dropdown list for each of the rule fields. Each dropdown list contains a list of field names extracted from the log index.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good


* The Rule field name column lists field names based on the selected log type and the rules that have been assigned to the detector.
* The log field name column includes a dropdown menu for each of the rule fields. Each dropdown menu contains a list of field names extracted from the log index.
* Use the dropdown arrow to open the list of log fields and select the log field name that corresponds to the rule field name directly to the left in the Rule field name column. You can enter text in the **Select a mapping field** box at the top of the menu to search for names in the log field list.
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

To map a rule field name to a log field name, use the dropdown arrow to open the list of log fields and select the log field name from the list. To search for names in the log field list, enter text in the Select a mapping field box.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good

* The log field name column includes a dropdown menu for each of the rule fields. Each dropdown menu contains a list of field names extracted from the log index.
* Use the dropdown arrow to open the list of log fields and select the log field name that corresponds to the rule field name directly to the left in the Rule field name column. You can enter text in the **Select a mapping field** box at the top of the menu to search for names in the log field list.
<br><img src="{{site.url}}{{site.baseurl}}/images/Security/log-field.png" alt="Field mapping example for pending mappings" width="600">
* Once the log field name is selected and mapped to the rule field name, the icon in the Status colum to the right changes to a green check mark.
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
* Once the log field name is selected and mapped to the rule field name, the icon in the Status colum to the right changes to a green check mark.
* Once the log field name is selected and mapped to the rule field name, the icon in the Status column to the right changes to a green check mark.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks

The **Default mapped fields** table contains mappings that the system made automatically after defining the detector. As shown in the image that follows, when the field names are similar to one another the system can successfully match the two.
<br><img src="{{site.url}}{{site.baseurl}}/images/Security/default-mappings.png" alt="Field mapping example for pending mappings" width="900">

Nevertheless, it's a good idea to review the mappings and verify that they are matched as expected and correct. If you find a mapping that doesn't appear to be accurate, you can use the dropdown menu as described in the **Pending field mappings** section above to correct the field mapping.
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
Nevertheless, it's a good idea to review the mappings and verify that they are matched as expected and correct. If you find a mapping that doesn't appear to be accurate, you can use the dropdown menu as described in the **Pending field mappings** section above to correct the field mapping.
Nevertheless, it's a good idea to review the mappings and verify that they are correct and matched as expected. If you find a mapping that doesn't appear to be accurate, you can use the dropdown list as described in the [Pending field mappings](#pending-field-mappings) section to correct the field mapping.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I like it.


Nevertheless, it's a good idea to review the mappings and verify that they are matched as expected and correct. If you find a mapping that doesn't appear to be accurate, you can use the dropdown menu as described in the **Pending field mappings** section above to correct the field mapping.

After completing the mappings, select the **Next** button in the lower-right corner of the screen. The Set up alerts page appears and displays settings for an alert trigger.
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
After completing the mappings, select the **Next** button in the lower-right corner of the screen. The Set up alerts page appears and displays settings for an alert trigger.
After completing the mappings, select the **Next** button in the lower-right corner of the screen. The **Set up alerts** page appears and displays settings for an alert trigger.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

OK, but we need to have a team talk on what we bold face in docs.

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I say bold all UI elements

This process requires that the user or administrator have some familiarity with the field names in the log index and an understanding of the data contained in those fields. Rule fields are named to promote their standardization and normalize them in the industry, and the names themselves are typically self explanatory. If a user has an understanding of the log data contained in a particular log field, the mapping is typically a simple and straightforward process.
{: .note }

* The Rule field name column lists field names based on the selected log type and the rules that have been assigned to the detector.
Copy link

@petardz petardz Jan 20, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

To be 100% factually correct here: these rule fields are coming from ALL pre-packaged rules of selected log type/category (rule category == log type)

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Changed to:
"The Rule field name column lists field names based on all of the pre-packaged rules associated with the selected log type."

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

That is perfect! Thank you!

cwillum and others added 3 commits January 20, 2023 15:09
Signed-off-by: cwillum <cwmmoore@amazon.com>
Signed-off-by: cwillum <cwmmoore@amazon.com>
Signed-off-by: cwillum <cwmmoore@amazon.com>
@cwillum cwillum added 5 - Editorial review PR: Editorial review in progress and removed 3 - Tech review PR: Tech review in progress 4 - Doc review PR: Doc review in progress labels Jan 21, 2023
Copy link
Collaborator

@natebower natebower left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@cwillum Please see my comments and changes and let me know if you have any questions. Thanks!


Field mapping matches field names for the rule with field names from the log being used to provide data. The mappings are automatically applied once the detector is defined in previous steps. This page offers the user the option to map log-specific field names to the internal rule field names.
The field mapping step matches field names from the rule with field names from the log index being used to provide data. Creating field mappings allows the system to accurately convey event data from the log to the detector and then use the data for triggering alerts.
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
The field mapping step matches field names from the rule with field names from the log index being used to provide data. Creating field mappings allows the system to accurately convey event data from the log to the detector and then use the data for triggering alerts.
The field mapping step matches field names from the rule with field names from the log index being used to provide data. Creating field mappings allows the system to accurately convey event data from the log to the detector and then use the data to trigger alerts.

* The Rule field name column lists field names based on all of the pre-packaged rules associated with the selected log type.
* The log field name column includes a dropdown list for each of the rule fields. Each dropdown list contains field names extracted from the log index.
* To map a rule field name to a log field name, use the dropdown arrow to open the list of log fields and select the log field name from the list. To search for names in the log field list, enter text in the **Select a mapping field** box.
<br><img src="{{site.url}}{{site.baseurl}}/images/Security/log-field.png" alt="Field mapping example for pending mappings" width="600">
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Reference the image in the text that precedes it. ", as shown in the following image." usually works.

Once you navigate to the Configure field mapping page, the system attempts to automatically map fields between the two sources. Those field names that are not automatically mapped appear in the **Pending field mapping** table. In this table you can manually map rule fields to log fields.
<br><img src="{{site.url}}{{site.baseurl}}/images/Security/pending-mappings.png" alt="Field mapping example for pending mappings" width="900">

* The Rule field name column lists field names based on all of the pre-packaged rules associated with the selected log type.
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The bulleted list should ideally be introduced by a brief sentence ending in a colon.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Added ...
"While mapping fields, consider the following:"

The **Default mapped fields** table contains mappings that the system made automatically after defining the detector. As shown in the image that follows, when the field names are similar to one another the system can successfully match the two.
<br><img src="{{site.url}}{{site.baseurl}}/images/Security/default-mappings.png" alt="Field mapping example for pending mappings" width="900">

Nevertheless, it's a good idea to review the mappings and verify that they are correct and matched as expected. If you find a mapping that doesn't appear to be accurate, you can use the dropdown list as described in the [Pending field mappings](#pending-field-mappings) section above to correct the field mapping.
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
Nevertheless, it's a good idea to review the mappings and verify that they are correct and matched as expected. If you find a mapping that doesn't appear to be accurate, you can use the dropdown list as described in the [Pending field mappings](#pending-field-mappings) section above to correct the field mapping.
Nevertheless, it's a good idea to review the mappings and verify that they are correct and matched as expected. If you find a mapping that doesn't appear to be accurate, you can use the dropdown list as described in the [Pending field mappings](#pending-field-mappings) section to correct the field mapping.

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can we use something simpler than "Nevertheless"? It may not be understood by Global English speakers.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I added this ...
"Although these automatic matches are normally dependable, it's still a good idea to review the mappings ..."

@natebower natebower removed the 5 - Editorial review PR: Editorial review in progress label Jan 23, 2023
…ch-project/documentation-website into fix#2400-field-mappings

Resolves merge conflict without fast forward.
Signed-off-by: cwillum <cwmmoore@amazon.com>
Signed-off-by: cwillum <cwmmoore@amazon.com>
Copy link
Contributor Author

@cwillum cwillum left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks, Nathan. I incorporated all changes.

Once you navigate to the Configure field mapping page, the system attempts to automatically map fields between the two sources. Those field names that are not automatically mapped appear in the **Pending field mapping** table. In this table you can manually map rule fields to log fields.
<br><img src="{{site.url}}{{site.baseurl}}/images/Security/pending-mappings.png" alt="Field mapping example for pending mappings" width="900">

* The Rule field name column lists field names based on all of the pre-packaged rules associated with the selected log type.
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Added ...
"While mapping fields, consider the following:"

The **Default mapped fields** table contains mappings that the system made automatically after defining the detector. As shown in the image that follows, when the field names are similar to one another the system can successfully match the two.
<br><img src="{{site.url}}{{site.baseurl}}/images/Security/default-mappings.png" alt="Field mapping example for pending mappings" width="900">

Nevertheless, it's a good idea to review the mappings and verify that they are correct and matched as expected. If you find a mapping that doesn't appear to be accurate, you can use the dropdown list as described in the [Pending field mappings](#pending-field-mappings) section above to correct the field mapping.
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I added this ...
"Although these automatic matches are normally dependable, it's still a good idea to review the mappings ..."

Signed-off-by: cwillum <cwmmoore@amazon.com>
Signed-off-by: cwillum <cwmmoore@amazon.com>
@cwillum cwillum merged commit e98ee6d into main Jan 23, 2023
@cwillum cwillum added the release-notes PR: Include this PR in the automated release notes label Jan 23, 2023
vagimeli pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 25, 2023
* fix#2400-field-mappings

Signed-off-by: cwillum <cwmmoore@amazon.com>

* fix#2400-field-mappings

Signed-off-by: cwillum <cwmmoore@amazon.com>

* fix#2400-field-mappings

Signed-off-by: cwillum <cwmmoore@amazon.com>

* fix#2400-field-mappings

Signed-off-by: cwillum <cwmmoore@amazon.com>

* fix#2400-field-mappings

Signed-off-by: cwillum <cwmmoore@amazon.com>

* fix#2400-field-mappings

Signed-off-by: cwillum <cwmmoore@amazon.com>

* fix#2400-field-mappings

Signed-off-by: cwillum <cwmmoore@amazon.com>

* fix#2400-field-mappings

Signed-off-by: cwillum <cwmmoore@amazon.com>

* fix#2400-field-mappings

Signed-off-by: cwillum <cwmmoore@amazon.com>

* fix#2400-field-mappings

Signed-off-by: cwillum <cwmmoore@amazon.com>

* fix#2400-field-mappings

Signed-off-by: cwillum <cwmmoore@amazon.com>

* fix#2400-field-mappings

Signed-off-by: cwillum <cwmmoore@amazon.com>

Signed-off-by: cwillum <cwmmoore@amazon.com>
vagimeli added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 26, 2023
vagimeli pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 27, 2023
* fix#2400-field-mappings

Signed-off-by: cwillum <cwmmoore@amazon.com>

* fix#2400-field-mappings

Signed-off-by: cwillum <cwmmoore@amazon.com>

* fix#2400-field-mappings

Signed-off-by: cwillum <cwmmoore@amazon.com>

* fix#2400-field-mappings

Signed-off-by: cwillum <cwmmoore@amazon.com>

* fix#2400-field-mappings

Signed-off-by: cwillum <cwmmoore@amazon.com>

* fix#2400-field-mappings

Signed-off-by: cwillum <cwmmoore@amazon.com>

* fix#2400-field-mappings

Signed-off-by: cwillum <cwmmoore@amazon.com>

* fix#2400-field-mappings

Signed-off-by: cwillum <cwmmoore@amazon.com>

* fix#2400-field-mappings

Signed-off-by: cwillum <cwmmoore@amazon.com>

* fix#2400-field-mappings

Signed-off-by: cwillum <cwmmoore@amazon.com>

* fix#2400-field-mappings

Signed-off-by: cwillum <cwmmoore@amazon.com>

* fix#2400-field-mappings

Signed-off-by: cwillum <cwmmoore@amazon.com>

Signed-off-by: cwillum <cwmmoore@amazon.com>
vagimeli added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 30, 2023
@hdhalter hdhalter deleted the fix#2400-field-mappings branch March 28, 2024 21:42
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
release-notes PR: Include this PR in the automated release notes v2.5.0 'Issues and PRs related to version v2.5.0'
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

9 participants