Replication namespace

[Tokesh]

Description

adding replication namespace specs

Issues Resolved

[#232]

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.
For more information on following Developer Certificate of Origin and signing off your commits, please check here.

[github-actions]

Changes Analysis

Commit SHA: 864ee68
Comparing To SHA: 8bf497c

API Changes

Summary

├─┬Paths
│ ├──[➕] path (4364:3)
│ ├──[➕] path (4212:3)
│ ├──[➕] path (4252:3)
│ ├──[➕] path (4290:3)
│ ├──[➕] path (4272:3)
│ ├──[➕] path (4310:3)
│ ├──[➕] path (4232:3)
│ ├──[➕] path (4175:3)
│ ├──[➕] path (4330:3)
│ └──[➕] path (4347:3)
└─┬Components
  ├──[➕] requestBodies (23557:7)
  ├──[➕] requestBodies (23527:7)
  ├──[➕] requestBodies (23539:7)
  ├──[➕] requestBodies (23551:7)
  ├──[➕] requestBodies (23533:7)
  ├──[➕] requestBodies (23545:7)
  ├──[➕] requestBodies (23521:7)
  ├──[➕] responses (25918:7)
  ├──[➕] responses (25965:7)
  ├──[➕] responses (25957:7)
  ├──[➕] responses (25923:7)
  ├──[➕] responses (25928:7)
  ├──[➕] responses (25902:7)
  ├──[➕] responses (25897:7)
  ├──[➕] responses (25944:7)
  ├──[➕] responses (25910:7)
  ├──[➕] responses (25952:7)
  ├──[➕] responses (25936:7)
  ├──[➕] parameters (20365:7)
  ├──[➕] parameters (20397:7)
  ├──[➕] parameters (20389:7)
  ├──[➕] parameters (20357:7)
  ├──[➕] parameters (20373:7)
  ├──[➕] parameters (20381:7)
  ├──[➕] schemas (48317:7)
  ├──[➕] schemas (48331:7)
  ├──[➕] schemas (48177:7)
  ├──[➕] schemas (48355:7)
  ├──[➕] schemas (48160:7)
  ├──[➕] schemas (48346:7)
  ├──[➕] schemas (48277:7)
  ├──[➕] schemas (48249:7)
  ├──[➕] schemas (48367:7)
  ├──[➕] schemas (48270:7)
  ├──[➕] schemas (48212:7)
  ├──[➕] schemas (48326:7)
  ├──[➕] schemas (48194:7)
  ├──[➕] schemas (48205:7)
  └──[➕] schemas (48294:7)

Document Element	Total Changes	Breaking Changes
paths	10	0
components	39	0

• Total Changes: 49
• Additions: 49

Report

The full API changes report is available at: https://github.com/opensearch-project/opensearch-api-specification/actions/runs/10230944005/artifacts/1772660331

API Coverage

	Before	After	Δ
Covered (%)	510 (49.95 %)	521 (51.03 %)	11 (1.08 %)
Uncovered (%)	511 (50.05 %)	500 (48.97 %)	-11 (-1.08 %)
Unknown	24	24	0

[dblock]

Should we split the docker-compose.yml into docker-compose-default, docker-compose-multinode.yml or something like that?

[Tokesh]

Should we split the docker-compose.yml into docker-compose-default, docker-compose-multinode.yml or something like that?

wow, do you work even on weekends?
Yes, I encountered this today, tested it on a local machine. Now I was thinking of asking whether it is worth separating or inventing some flags.

[dblock]

Take a look at #472 that allows custom docker compose and tests.

[Tokesh]

Take a look at #472 that allows custom docker compose and tests.

Thank you! It looks really good
I'll wait for your PR to merge so I can continue working on the replication namespace.

[dblock]

Take a look at #472 that allows custom docker compose and tests.

Thank you! It looks really good I'll wait for your PR to merge so I can continue working on the replication namespace.

@Tokesh that got merged FYI