Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

OCPBUGS-3885: Fix post timeout reconcile #388

Merged
merged 2 commits into from Nov 21, 2022

Conversation

jc-rh
Copy link
Member

@jc-rh jc-rh commented Nov 18, 2022

  • Set completed timestamp for the timed out case too and prevent re-executing post timeout handling which sometimes causes infinite reconcile loop and duplicate cluster status entries
  • Re-order the succeed condition check so that the prep phase logic doesn't get executed post timeout mistakenly

@jc-rh jc-rh added the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Nov 18, 2022
@jc-rh jc-rh changed the title Fix post timeout reconcile OCPBUGS-3885: Fix post timeout reconcile Nov 18, 2022
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Nov 18, 2022
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@jc-rh: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-3885, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target version (4.13.0) matches configured target version for branch (4.13.0)
  • bug is in the state New, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @yliu127

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Nov 18, 2022

@openshift-ci-robot: GitHub didn't allow me to request PR reviews from the following users: yliu127.

Note that only openshift-kni members and repo collaborators can review this PR, and authors cannot review their own PRs.

In response to this:

@jc-rh: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-3885, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target version (4.13.0) matches configured target version for branch (4.13.0)
  • bug is in the state New, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @yliu127

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@jc-rh
Copy link
Member Author

jc-rh commented Nov 19, 2022

/assign @fontivan

@fontivan
Copy link
Contributor

/approve

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Nov 21, 2022
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@jc-rh: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-3885, which is valid.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target version (4.13.0) matches configured target version for branch (4.13.0)
  • bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @yliu127

In response to this:

  • Set completed time out the timed out case and prevent re-executing post timeout handling which sometimes causes infinite reconcile loop and duplicate cluster status entries
  • Re-order the succeed condition check so that the prep phase logic doesn't get executed post timeout by mistakenly

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Nov 21, 2022

@openshift-ci-robot: GitHub didn't allow me to request PR reviews from the following users: yliu127.

Note that only openshift-kni members and repo collaborators can review this PR, and authors cannot review their own PRs.

In response to this:

@jc-rh: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-3885, which is valid.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target version (4.13.0) matches configured target version for branch (4.13.0)
  • bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @yliu127

In response to this:

  • Set completed time out the timed out case and prevent re-executing post timeout handling which sometimes causes infinite reconcile loop and duplicate cluster status entries
  • Re-order the succeed condition check so that the prep phase logic doesn't get executed post timeout by mistakenly

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@jc-rh: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-3885, which is valid.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target version (4.13.0) matches configured target version for branch (4.13.0)
  • bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @yliu127

In response to this:

  • Set completed timestamp for the timed out case too and prevent re-executing post timeout handling which sometimes causes infinite reconcile loop and duplicate cluster status entries
  • Re-order the succeed condition check so that the prep phase logic doesn't get executed post timeout by mistakenly

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Nov 21, 2022

@openshift-ci-robot: GitHub didn't allow me to request PR reviews from the following users: yliu127.

Note that only openshift-kni members and repo collaborators can review this PR, and authors cannot review their own PRs.

In response to this:

@jc-rh: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-3885, which is valid.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target version (4.13.0) matches configured target version for branch (4.13.0)
  • bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @yliu127

In response to this:

  • Set completed timestamp for the timed out case too and prevent re-executing post timeout handling which sometimes causes infinite reconcile loop and duplicate cluster status entries
  • Re-order the succeed condition check so that the prep phase logic doesn't get executed post timeout by mistakenly

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@jc-rh: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-3885, which is valid.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target version (4.13.0) matches configured target version for branch (4.13.0)
  • bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @yliu127

In response to this:

  • Set completed timestamp for the timed out case too and prevent re-executing post timeout handling which sometimes causes infinite reconcile loop and duplicate cluster status entries
  • Re-order the succeed condition check so that the prep phase logic doesn't get executed post timeout mistakenly

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Nov 21, 2022

@openshift-ci-robot: GitHub didn't allow me to request PR reviews from the following users: yliu127.

Note that only openshift-kni members and repo collaborators can review this PR, and authors cannot review their own PRs.

In response to this:

@jc-rh: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-3885, which is valid.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target version (4.13.0) matches configured target version for branch (4.13.0)
  • bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @yliu127

In response to this:

  • Set completed timestamp for the timed out case too and prevent re-executing post timeout handling which sometimes causes infinite reconcile loop and duplicate cluster status entries
  • Re-order the succeed condition check so that the prep phase logic doesn't get executed post timeout mistakenly

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@sabbir-47
Copy link
Contributor

/approve

@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Nov 21, 2022

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: fontivan, sabbir-47

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@sabbir-47
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Nov 21, 2022
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit f515238 into openshift-kni:main Nov 21, 2022
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@jc-rh: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged:

Jira Issue OCPBUGS-3885 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

In response to this:

  • Set completed timestamp for the timed out case too and prevent re-executing post timeout handling which sometimes causes infinite reconcile loop and duplicate cluster status entries
  • Re-order the succeed condition check so that the prep phase logic doesn't get executed post timeout mistakenly

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@jc-rh
Copy link
Member Author

jc-rh commented Nov 21, 2022

/cherrypick release-4.12

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@jc-rh: new pull request created: #389

In response to this:

/cherrypick release-4.12

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

6 participants