Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

OCPBUGS-10637: Set selinux permissive before backup/restore #507

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Mar 23, 2023

Conversation

jc-rh
Copy link
Member

@jc-rh jc-rh commented Mar 22, 2023

Short term fix for coreos 9.2
Will revisit when we get to https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OCPBUGS-8054

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@jc-rh: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-10637, which is invalid:

  • expected the bug to target the "4.14.0" version, but no target version was set

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@jc-rh
Copy link
Member Author

jc-rh commented Mar 22, 2023

/assign @donpenney

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@jc-rh: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-10637, which is invalid:

  • expected the bug to target the "4.14.0" version, but no target version was set

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

Short term fix for coreos 9.2

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@jc-rh
Copy link
Member Author

jc-rh commented Mar 22, 2023

/jira refresh

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@jc-rh: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-10637, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target version (4.14.0) matches configured target version for branch (4.14.0)
  • bug is in the state ASSIGNED, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @yliu127

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Mar 22, 2023

@openshift-ci-robot: GitHub didn't allow me to request PR reviews from the following users: yliu127.

Note that only openshift-kni members and repo collaborators can review this PR, and authors cannot review their own PRs.

In response to this:

@jc-rh: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-10637, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target version (4.14.0) matches configured target version for branch (4.14.0)
  • bug is in the state ASSIGNED, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @yliu127

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@jc-rh: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-10637, which is valid.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target version (4.14.0) matches configured target version for branch (4.14.0)
  • bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @yliu127

In response to this:

Short term fix for coreos 9.2
Will revisit when we get to https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OCPBUGS-8054

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Mar 22, 2023

@openshift-ci-robot: GitHub didn't allow me to request PR reviews from the following users: yliu127.

Note that only openshift-kni members and repo collaborators can review this PR, and authors cannot review their own PRs.

In response to this:

@jc-rh: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-10637, which is valid.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target version (4.14.0) matches configured target version for branch (4.14.0)
  • bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @yliu127

In response to this:

Short term fix for coreos 9.2
Will revisit when we get to https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OCPBUGS-8054

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@jc-rh
Copy link
Member Author

jc-rh commented Mar 22, 2023

/assign @sabbir-47

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Mar 23, 2023
@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Mar 23, 2023

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: donpenney

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Mar 23, 2023
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 87af16e into openshift-kni:main Mar 23, 2023
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@jc-rh: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-10637: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged:

Jira Issue OCPBUGS-10637 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

In response to this:

Short term fix for coreos 9.2
Will revisit when we get to https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OCPBUGS-8054

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@jc-rh
Copy link
Member Author

jc-rh commented Mar 24, 2023

/cherrypick release-4.13

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@jc-rh: new pull request created: #509

In response to this:

/cherrypick release-4.13

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

6 participants