Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

OCPBUGS-33232: Fix Tasks lists from another namespace #98

Merged

Conversation

vikram-raj
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved label May 3, 2024
@vikram-raj vikram-raj requested review from lokanandaprabhu and removed request for Lucifergene May 3, 2024 06:47
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented May 3, 2024

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: lokanandaprabhu, vikram-raj

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
  • OWNERS [lokanandaprabhu,vikram-raj]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@vikram-raj vikram-raj changed the title Fix Tasks lists from another namespace OCPBUGS-33232: Fix Tasks lists from another namespace May 3, 2024
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Collaborator

@vikram-raj: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-33232, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target version (4.16.0) matches configured target version for branch (4.16.0)
  • bug is in the state New, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @sanketpathak

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented May 3, 2024

@openshift-ci-robot: GitHub didn't allow me to request PR reviews from the following users: sanketpathak.

Note that only openshift-pipelines members and repo collaborators can review this PR, and authors cannot review their own PRs.

In response to this:

@vikram-raj: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-33232, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target version (4.16.0) matches configured target version for branch (4.16.0)
  • bug is in the state New, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @sanketpathak

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-merge-bot openshift-merge-bot bot merged commit 9108fa3 into openshift-pipelines:main May 3, 2024
9 checks passed
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Collaborator

@vikram-raj: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-33232: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged:

Jira Issue OCPBUGS-33232 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@vikram-raj vikram-raj deleted the fix-tasksList branch May 3, 2024 08:04
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants