MGMT-14631: Remove support for openshift 4.8

[danmanor]

Remove support for openshift 4.8

List all the issues related to this PR

• New Feature
• Enhancement
• Bug fix
• Tests
• Documentation
• CI/CD

What environments does this code impact?

• Automation (CI, tools, etc)
• Cloud
• Operator Managed Deployments
• None

How was this code tested?

• assisted-test-infra environment
• dev-scripts environment
• Reviewer's test appreciated
• Waiting for CI to do a full test run
• Manual (Elaborate on how it was tested)
• No tests needed

Checklist

• Title and description added to both, commit and PR.
• Relevant issues have been associated (see CONTRIBUTING guide)
• This change does not require a documentation update (docstring, docs, README, etc)
• Does this change include unit-tests (note that code changes require unit-tests)

Reviewers Checklist

• Are the title and description (in both PR and commit) meaningful and clear?
• Is there a bug required (and linked) for this change?
• Should this PR be backported?

[openshift-ci-robot]

@danmanor: This pull request references MGMT-14631 which is a valid jira issue.

In response to this:

Remove support for openshift 4.8

List all the issues related to this PR

• New Feature
• Enhancement
• Bug fix
• Tests
• Documentation
• CI/CD

What environments does this code impact?

• Automation (CI, tools, etc)
• Cloud
• Operator Managed Deployments
• None

How was this code tested?

• assisted-test-infra environment
• dev-scripts environment
• Reviewer's test appreciated
• Waiting for CI to do a full test run
• Manual (Elaborate on how it was tested)
• No tests needed

Checklist

• Title and description added to both, commit and PR.
• Relevant issues have been associated (see CONTRIBUTING guide)
• This change does not require a documentation update (docstring, docs, README, etc)
• Does this change include unit-tests (note that code changes require unit-tests)

Reviewers Checklist

• Are the title and description (in both PR and commit) meaningful and clear?
• Is there a bug required (and linked) for this change?
• Should this PR be backported?

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[openshift-ci-robot]

@danmanor: This pull request references MGMT-14631 which is a valid jira issue.

In response to this:

Remove support for openshift 4.8

List all the issues related to this PR

• New Feature
• Enhancement
• Bug fix
• Tests
• Documentation
• CI/CD

What environments does this code impact?

• Automation (CI, tools, etc)
• Cloud
• Operator Managed Deployments
• None

How was this code tested?

• assisted-test-infra environment
• dev-scripts environment
• Reviewer's test appreciated
• Waiting for CI to do a full test run
• Manual (Elaborate on how it was tested)
• No tests needed

Checklist

• Title and description added to both, commit and PR.
• Relevant issues have been associated (see CONTRIBUTING guide)
• This change does not require a documentation update (docstring, docs, README, etc)
• Does this change include unit-tests (note that code changes require unit-tests)

Reviewers Checklist

• Are the title and description (in both PR and commit) meaningful and clear?
• Is there a bug required (and linked) for this change?
• Should this PR be backported?

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[danmanor]

/hold

[danmanor]

/cc @osherdp

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #5221 (f6ec2a9) into master (db30aab) will decrease coverage by 0.01%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

❗ Current head f6ec2a9 differs from pull request most recent head dad21ee. Consider uploading reports for the commit dad21ee to get more accurate results

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #5221      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   67.49%   67.49%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         221      221              
  Lines       33039    33045       +6     
==========================================
+ Hits        22299    22303       +4     
- Misses       8728     8729       +1     
- Partials     2012     2013       +1     

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
internal/featuresupport/support_levels_list.go	100.00% <ø> (ø)

... and 3 files with indirect coverage changes

[danmanor]

/uncc @filanov @gamli75 @osherdp

[danmanor]

/retest-required

[danmanor]

/test

[danmanor]

/test edge-e2e-metal-assisted-mce

[osherdp]

Looks good, I guess we first need to remove the jobs that are doing installation on top of 4.8

[danmanor]

@osherdp sorry, needed rebase

[openshift-ci]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: danmanor, osherdp

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS [danmanor,osherdp]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[danmanor]

/test edge-e2e-ai-operator-ztp

[danmanor]

/unhold

[openshift-ci]

@danmanor: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.