Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

MGMT-15972: Remove Swagger definition for api_vip and ingress_vip #5734

Merged

Conversation

nmagnezi
Copy link
Contributor

@nmagnezi nmagnezi commented Nov 26, 2023

Additionaly, add a db migration to populate those VIPs in api_vips and ingress_vips arrays.

List all the issues related to this PR

  • New Feature
  • Enhancement
  • Bug fix
  • Tests
  • Documentation
  • CI/CD

What environments does this code impact?

  • Automation (CI, tools, etc)
  • Cloud
  • Operator Managed Deployments
  • None

How was this code tested?

  • assisted-test-infra environment
  • dev-scripts environment
  • Reviewer's test appreciated
  • Waiting for CI to do a full test run
  • Manual (Elaborate on how it was tested)
  • No tests needed

Checklist

  • Title and description added to both, commit and PR.
  • Relevant issues have been associated (see CONTRIBUTING guide)
  • This change does not require a documentation update (docstring, docs, README, etc)
  • Does this change include unit-tests (note that code changes require unit-tests)

Reviewers Checklist

  • Are the title and description (in both PR and commit) meaningful and clear?
  • Is there a bug required (and linked) for this change?
  • Should this PR be backported?

Additionaly, add a db migration to populate those VIPs in api_vips and ingress_vips arrays.
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. label Nov 26, 2023
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Nov 26, 2023

@nmagnezi: This pull request references MGMT-15972 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the task to target the "4.15.0" version, but no target version was set.

In response to this:

Additionaly, add a db migration to populate those VIPs in api_vips and ingress_vips arrays.

List all the issues related to this PR

  • New Feature
  • Enhancement
  • Bug fix
  • Tests
  • Documentation
  • CI/CD

What environments does this code impact?

  • Automation (CI, tools, etc)
  • Cloud
  • Operator Managed Deployments
  • None

How was this code tested?

  • assisted-test-infra environment
  • dev-scripts environment
  • Reviewer's test appreciated
  • Waiting for CI to do a full test run
  • Manual (Elaborate on how it was tested)
  • No tests needed

Checklist

  • Title and description added to both, commit and PR.
  • Relevant issues have been associated (see CONTRIBUTING guide)
  • This change does not require a documentation update (docstring, docs, README, etc)
  • Does this change include unit-tests (note that code changes require unit-tests)

Reviewers Checklist

  • Are the title and description (in both PR and commit) meaningful and clear?
  • Is there a bug required (and linked) for this change?
  • Should this PR be backported?

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. label Nov 26, 2023
@nmagnezi
Copy link
Contributor Author

/assign @filanov

/hold
until we make sure UI does not get broken for this change.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. api-review Categorizes an issue or PR as actively needing an API review. approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. labels Nov 26, 2023
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Nov 26, 2023

@nmagnezi: This pull request references MGMT-15972 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the task to target the "4.15.0" version, but no target version was set.

In response to this:

Additionaly, add a db migration to populate those VIPs in api_vips and ingress_vips arrays.

List all the issues related to this PR

  • New Feature
  • Enhancement
  • Bug fix
  • Tests
  • Documentation
  • CI/CD

What environments does this code impact?

  • Automation (CI, tools, etc)
  • Cloud
  • Operator Managed Deployments
  • None

How was this code tested?

  • assisted-test-infra environment
  • dev-scripts environment
  • Reviewer's test appreciated
  • Waiting for CI to do a full test run
  • Manual (Elaborate on how it was tested)
  • No tests needed

Checklist

  • Title and description added to both, commit and PR.
  • Relevant issues have been associated (see CONTRIBUTING guide)
  • This change does not require a documentation update (docstring, docs, README, etc)
  • Does this change include unit-tests (note that code changes require unit-tests)

Reviewers Checklist

  • Are the title and description (in both PR and commit) meaningful and clear?
  • Is there a bug required (and linked) for this change?
  • Should this PR be backported?

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Nov 26, 2023

@nmagnezi: This pull request references MGMT-15972 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the task to target the "4.15.0" version, but no target version was set.

In response to this:

Additionaly, add a db migration to populate those VIPs in api_vips and ingress_vips arrays.

List all the issues related to this PR

  • New Feature
  • Enhancement
  • Bug fix
  • Tests
  • Documentation
  • CI/CD

What environments does this code impact?

  • Automation (CI, tools, etc)
  • Cloud
  • Operator Managed Deployments
  • None

How was this code tested?

  • assisted-test-infra environment
  • dev-scripts environment
  • Reviewer's test appreciated
  • Waiting for CI to do a full test run
  • Manual (Elaborate on how it was tested)
  • No tests needed

Checklist

  • Title and description added to both, commit and PR.
  • Relevant issues have been associated (see CONTRIBUTING guide)
  • This change does not require a documentation update (docstring, docs, README, etc)
  • Does this change include unit-tests (note that code changes require unit-tests)

Reviewers Checklist

  • Are the title and description (in both PR and commit) meaningful and clear?
  • Is there a bug required (and linked) for this change?
  • Should this PR be backported?

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Nov 26, 2023

@nmagnezi: This pull request references MGMT-15972 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the task to target the "4.15.0" version, but no target version was set.

In response to this:

Additionaly, add a db migration to populate those VIPs in api_vips and ingress_vips arrays.

List all the issues related to this PR

  • New Feature
  • Enhancement
  • Bug fix
  • Tests
  • Documentation
  • CI/CD

What environments does this code impact?

  • Automation (CI, tools, etc)
  • Cloud
  • Operator Managed Deployments
  • None

How was this code tested?

  • assisted-test-infra environment
  • dev-scripts environment
  • Reviewer's test appreciated
  • Waiting for CI to do a full test run
  • Manual (Elaborate on how it was tested)
  • No tests needed

Checklist

  • Title and description added to both, commit and PR.
  • Relevant issues have been associated (see CONTRIBUTING guide)
  • This change does not require a documentation update (docstring, docs, README, etc)
  • Does this change include unit-tests (note that code changes require unit-tests)

Reviewers Checklist

  • Are the title and description (in both PR and commit) meaningful and clear?
  • Is there a bug required (and linked) for this change?
  • Should this PR be backported?

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 26, 2023

Codecov Report

Merging #5734 (76b615f) into master (85498bc) will increase coverage by 0.14%.
Report is 4 commits behind head on master.
The diff coverage is 60.00%.

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #5734      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   67.99%   68.13%   +0.14%     
==========================================
  Files         233      234       +1     
  Lines       34324    34464     +140     
==========================================
+ Hits        23338    23483     +145     
+ Misses       8919     8917       -2     
+ Partials     2067     2064       -3     
Files Coverage Δ
internal/migrations/migrations.go 89.65% <100.00%> (+0.36%) ⬆️
...1010101010_drop_cluster_api_vip_and_ingress_vip.go 57.14% <57.14%> (ø)

... and 3 files with indirect coverage changes

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Nov 26, 2023
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Nov 26, 2023

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: filanov, nmagnezi

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@nmagnezi
Copy link
Contributor Author

/test edge-e2e-metal-assisted

@tsorya
Copy link
Contributor

tsorya commented Nov 28, 2023

We allow breaking api?

@nmagnezi
Copy link
Contributor Author

/test edge-e2e-metal-assisted

@nmagnezi
Copy link
Contributor Author

We allow breaking api?

We have completed phase 3 as described in https://github.com/openshift/assisted-service/blob/master/docs/enhancements/dual-stack-vips.md#phase-3

now we remove those fields after the deprecation cycle has been completed.

@nmagnezi
Copy link
Contributor Author

/test edge-e2e-metal-assisted
/unhold

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Nov 28, 2023
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 22889d8 and 2 for PR HEAD 76b615f in total

Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Nov 28, 2023

@nmagnezi: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@openshift-merge-bot openshift-merge-bot bot merged commit 571e57d into openshift:master Nov 28, 2023
15 checks passed
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

[ART PR BUILD NOTIFIER]

This PR has been included in build ose-agent-installer-api-server-container-v4.15.0-202311290051.p0.g571e57d.assembly.stream for distgit ose-agent-installer-api-server.
All builds following this will include this PR.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
api-review Categorizes an issue or PR as actively needing an API review. approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants