Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

MGMT-16330: disable SDN for 4.15 and above #5833

Merged

Conversation

rccrdpccl
Copy link
Contributor

This PR aims at disabling SDN option when installing OCP 4.15 and above

List all the issues related to this PR

  • New Feature
  • Enhancement
  • Bug fix
  • Tests
  • Documentation
  • CI/CD

What environments does this code impact?

  • Automation (CI, tools, etc)
  • Cloud
  • Operator Managed Deployments
  • None

How was this code tested?

  • assisted-test-infra environment
  • dev-scripts environment
  • Reviewer's test appreciated
  • Waiting for CI to do a full test run
  • Manual (Elaborate on how it was tested)
  • No tests needed

Checklist

  • Title and description added to both, commit and PR.
  • Relevant issues have been associated (see CONTRIBUTING guide)
  • This change does not require a documentation update (docstring, docs, README, etc)
  • Does this change include unit-tests (note that code changes require unit-tests)

Reviewers Checklist

  • Are the title and description (in both PR and commit) meaningful and clear?
  • Is there a bug required (and linked) for this change?
  • Should this PR be backported?

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. label Dec 20, 2023
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Dec 20, 2023

@rccrdpccl: This pull request references MGMT-16330 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the epic to target the "4.16.0" version, but no target version was set.

In response to this:

This PR aims at disabling SDN option when installing OCP 4.15 and above

List all the issues related to this PR

  • New Feature
  • Enhancement
  • Bug fix
  • Tests
  • Documentation
  • CI/CD

What environments does this code impact?

  • Automation (CI, tools, etc)
  • Cloud
  • Operator Managed Deployments
  • None

How was this code tested?

  • assisted-test-infra environment
  • dev-scripts environment
  • Reviewer's test appreciated
  • Waiting for CI to do a full test run
  • Manual (Elaborate on how it was tested)
  • No tests needed

Checklist

  • Title and description added to both, commit and PR.
  • Relevant issues have been associated (see CONTRIBUTING guide)
  • This change does not require a documentation update (docstring, docs, README, etc)
  • Does this change include unit-tests (note that code changes require unit-tests)

Reviewers Checklist

  • Are the title and description (in both PR and commit) meaningful and clear?
  • Is there a bug required (and linked) for this change?
  • Should this PR be backported?

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Dec 20, 2023
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Dec 20, 2023

Skipping CI for Draft Pull Request.
If you want CI signal for your change, please convert it to an actual PR.
You can still manually trigger a test run with /test all

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. api-review Categorizes an issue or PR as actively needing an API review. approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. labels Dec 20, 2023
Copy link
Contributor

@adriengentil adriengentil left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

not sure if these changes are enough to forbid the setting on back-end side, is that what we want?

internal/featuresupport/feature_support_test.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@rccrdpccl
Copy link
Contributor Author

not sure if these changes are enough to forbid the setting on back-end side, is that what we want?

Yes that's what we want, I misread a bit of code and thought it was automatic, so you're right it is not enough

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added size/XL Denotes a PR that changes 500-999 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Dec 22, 2023
@rccrdpccl rccrdpccl marked this pull request as ready for review December 22, 2023 15:08
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Dec 22, 2023
@rccrdpccl
Copy link
Contributor Author

/refresh

@rccrdpccl
Copy link
Contributor Author

/hold

Holding to control merge once back from PTO

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Dec 22, 2023
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 22, 2023

Codecov Report

Attention: 13 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Comparison is base (893fffb) 67.96% compared to head (aa3cb2b) 69.27%.
Report is 14 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #5833      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   67.96%   69.27%   +1.31%     
==========================================
  Files         235      235              
  Lines       34482    35855    +1373     
==========================================
+ Hits        23435    24838    +1403     
+ Misses       8981     8926      -55     
- Partials     2066     2091      +25     
Files Coverage Δ
internal/featuresupport/feature_support_level.go 89.47% <ø> (ø)
internal/featuresupport/common.go 87.09% <88.00%> (+0.73%) ⬆️
internal/bminventory/inventory.go 78.85% <81.81%> (+7.41%) ⬆️
internal/featuresupport/features_networking.go 85.34% <89.47%> (+1.34%) ⬆️

... and 18 files with indirect coverage changes

internal/bminventory/inventory.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
internal/featuresupport/features_networking.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
internal/featuresupport/support_level_feature.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Dec 24, 2023
Signed-off-by: Riccardo Piccoli <rpiccoli@redhat.com>
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jan 2, 2024
@rccrdpccl
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

1 similar comment
@rccrdpccl
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jan 2, 2024
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Jan 2, 2024

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: adriengentil, gamli75, rccrdpccl

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
  • OWNERS [adriengentil,gamli75,rccrdpccl]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@adriengentil
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

3 similar comments
@adriengentil
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

@adriengentil
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

@rccrdpccl
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

@rccrdpccl
Copy link
Contributor Author

/override e2e-agent-compact-ipv4

Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Jan 8, 2024

@rccrdpccl: /override requires failed status contexts, check run or a prowjob name to operate on.
The following unknown contexts/checkruns were given:

  • e2e-agent-compact-ipv4

Only the following failed contexts/checkruns were expected:

  • ci/prow/e2e-agent-compact-ipv4
  • ci/prow/edge-ci-index
  • ci/prow/edge-e2e-ai-operator-disconnected-capi
  • ci/prow/edge-e2e-ai-operator-ztp
  • ci/prow/edge-e2e-ai-operator-ztp-capi
  • ci/prow/edge-e2e-metal-assisted
  • ci/prow/edge-images
  • ci/prow/edge-lint
  • ci/prow/edge-subsystem-aws
  • ci/prow/edge-subsystem-kubeapi-aws
  • ci/prow/edge-unit-test
  • ci/prow/edge-verify-generated-code
  • ci/prow/images
  • ci/prow/mce-images
  • pull-ci-openshift-assisted-service-cloud_hotfix_releases-images
  • pull-ci-openshift-assisted-service-master-e2e-agent-compact-ipv4
  • pull-ci-openshift-assisted-service-master-edge-ci-index
  • pull-ci-openshift-assisted-service-master-edge-e2e-ai-operator-disconnected-capi
  • pull-ci-openshift-assisted-service-master-edge-e2e-ai-operator-ztp
  • pull-ci-openshift-assisted-service-master-edge-e2e-ai-operator-ztp-capi
  • pull-ci-openshift-assisted-service-master-edge-e2e-metal-assisted
  • pull-ci-openshift-assisted-service-master-edge-images
  • pull-ci-openshift-assisted-service-master-edge-lint
  • pull-ci-openshift-assisted-service-master-edge-subsystem-aws
  • pull-ci-openshift-assisted-service-master-edge-subsystem-kubeapi-aws
  • pull-ci-openshift-assisted-service-master-edge-unit-test
  • pull-ci-openshift-assisted-service-master-edge-verify-generated-code
  • pull-ci-openshift-assisted-service-master-mce-images
  • tide

If you are trying to override a checkrun that has a space in it, you must put a double quote on the context.

In response to this:

/override e2e-agent-compact-ipv4

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@rccrdpccl
Copy link
Contributor Author

/override ci/prow/e2e-agent-compact-ipv4
/unhold

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Jan 8, 2024
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Jan 8, 2024

@rccrdpccl: Overrode contexts on behalf of rccrdpccl: ci/prow/e2e-agent-compact-ipv4

In response to this:

/override ci/prow/e2e-agent-compact-ipv4
/unhold

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Jan 8, 2024

@rccrdpccl: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@openshift-merge-bot openshift-merge-bot bot merged commit 2f45852 into openshift:master Jan 8, 2024
16 checks passed
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

[ART PR BUILD NOTIFIER]

This PR has been included in build ose-agent-installer-api-server-container-v4.16.0-202401082351.p0.g2f45852.assembly.stream for distgit ose-agent-installer-api-server.
All builds following this will include this PR.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
api-review Categorizes an issue or PR as actively needing an API review. approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/XL Denotes a PR that changes 500-999 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants