OCPBUGS-15823: Change CSI RPC call timeouts

[gnufied]

Fixes https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OCPBUGS-15823

Note to reviewers - these changes are not there in upstream yet. But I did some measurements and IMO they make sense. Generally speaking detaches are slower than attaches and in my measurements most attaches finished within 10-15s, detaches occasionally took slightly more, sometimes.

So keeping a 60s interval of these operations IMO should be fine.

[openshift-ci-robot]

@gnufied: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-15823, which is invalid:

• expected the bug to target the "4.14.0" version, but no target version was set

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

In response to this:

Fixes https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OCPBUGS-15823

Note to reviewers - these changes are not there in upstream yet. But I did some measurements and IMO they make sense. Generally speaking detaches are slower than attaches and in my measurements most attaches finished within 10-15s, detaches occasionally took slightly more, sometimes.

So keeping a 60s interval of these operations IMO should be fine.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[gnufied]

/jira refresh

[openshift-ci]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: gnufied

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS [gnufied]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[openshift-ci-robot]

@gnufied: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-15823, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug

• bug is open, matching expected state (open)
• bug target version (4.14.0) matches configured target version for branch (4.14.0)
• bug is in the state ASSIGNED, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)

No GitHub users were found matching the public email listed for the QA contact in Jira (wduan@redhat.com), skipping review request.

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[gnufied]

/retest

[bertinatto]

/lgtm

[openshift-ci]

@gnufied: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name	Commit	Details	Required	Rerun command
ci/prow/e2e-aws-csi-extended	0697ead	link	false	/test e2e-aws-csi-extended

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

[openshift-ci-robot]

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD eeaa58c and 2 for PR HEAD 0697ead in total

[openshift-ci-robot]

@gnufied: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-15823: Some pull requests linked via external trackers have merged:

The following pull requests linked via external trackers have not merged:

• openshift/gcp-pd-csi-driver-operator#73 is open

These pull request must merge or be unlinked from the Jira bug in order for it to move to the next state. Once unlinked, request a bug refresh with /jira refresh.

Jira Issue OCPBUGS-15823 has not been moved to the MODIFIED state.

In response to this:

Fixes https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OCPBUGS-15823

Note to reviewers - these changes are not there in upstream yet. But I did some measurements and IMO they make sense. Generally speaking detaches are slower than attaches and in my measurements most attaches finished within 10-15s, detaches occasionally took slightly more, sometimes.

So keeping a 60s interval of these operations IMO should be fine.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.