Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Vendor the apis submodule #162

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Jul 1, 2021

Conversation

honza
Copy link
Member

@honza honza commented Jun 30, 2021

Downstream builds are failing because without the vendor directory,
go build will try to download the modules from the internet.

Downstream builds are failing because without the vendor directory,
`go build` will try to download the modules from the internet.
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from asalkeld and russellb June 30, 2021 10:31
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jun 30, 2021
@honza
Copy link
Member Author

honza commented Jun 30, 2021

Hmmmm, maybe this isn't it.

The images job previously passed without the vendor subdirectory.

@honza
Copy link
Member Author

honza commented Jun 30, 2021

/hold

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Jun 30, 2021
@honza
Copy link
Member Author

honza commented Jun 30, 2021

/retest

@jupierce
Copy link

Builds succeeding in CI is not a perfect indicator of whether a component can build downstream in Red Hat's build infrastructure. The latter is restricted from accessing the Internet.

@honza
Copy link
Member Author

honza commented Jun 30, 2021

/hold cancel

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Jun 30, 2021
@honza
Copy link
Member Author

honza commented Jun 30, 2021

I was finally able to reproduce the issue from brew in my local environment, and I'm pretty confident that this PR is the correct fix.

@asalkeld
Copy link

/retest
/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jun 30, 2021
@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Jun 30, 2021

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: asalkeld, honza

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

1 similar comment
@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 6598a7b into openshift:master Jul 1, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants