Bug 2069740: Avoid kubernetes node port range #175
Conversation
openshift-ci
bot
added
the
approved
cybertron
changed the title
openshift-ci
bot
added
the
bugzilla/severity-medium
|
@cybertron: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2069740, which is invalid:
Comment In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
openshift-ci
bot
added
the
bugzilla/invalid-bug
|
/bugzilla refresh |
openshift-ci
bot
added
bugzilla/valid-bug
|
@cybertron: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2069740, which is valid. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker. 3 validation(s) were run on this bug
No GitHub users were found matching the public email listed for the QA contact in Bugzilla (vvoronko@redhat.com), skipping review request. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
|
/retest-required |
|
/retest-required |
|
/hold It's been suggested that we make this 20000 more than the actual service port (9445 in this case). |
openshift-ci
bot
added
the
do-not-merge/hold
Per [0], the range 30000-32767 is used for kubernetes node ports. We should not have haproxy listening in that range to avoid possible conflicts. Setting the port to 20000 higher than the service port, per the network team convention[1]. 0: https://github.com/openshift/openshift-docs/blob/main/modules/installation-network-user-infra.adoc 1: openshift/enhancements#1076 (comment)
cybertron
force-pushed
the
avoid-kube-ports
branch
from
888164b
to
452c48b
Compare
|
@cybertron: all tests passed! Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: creydr, cybertron The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
|
/hold cancel |
openshift-ci
bot
removed
the
do-not-merge/hold
|
@cybertron: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged: Bugzilla bug 2069740 has been moved to the MODIFIED state. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
|
/cherry-pick release-4.10 |
|
@cybertron: new pull request created: #178 In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
Per [0], the range 30000-32767 is used for kubernetes node ports.
We should not have haproxy listening in that range to avoid possible
conflicts.
0: https://github.com/openshift/openshift-docs/blob/main/modules/installation-network-user-infra.adoc