Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Exclude new backends to avoid failing in aggregated jobs #3494

Conversation

DennisPeriquet
Copy link
Contributor

@DennisPeriquet DennisPeriquet commented Jun 20, 2023

TRT-1095

The new backends are enumerated in the backend_disruption...json file and not present in the older backend_disruption...json files like this.

To get the list of new ones, I did this and compared current one with one before the new backends were added.

$ cat backend-disruption_20230619-190241.json |jq '.BackendDisruptions|keys[]'

Reference: the new backends were added in these functions.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Jun 20, 2023
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jun 20, 2023

Skipping CI for Draft Pull Request.
If you want CI signal for your change, please convert it to an actual PR.
You can still manually trigger a test run with /test all

@DennisPeriquet DennisPeriquet marked this pull request as ready for review June 20, 2023 16:08
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Jun 20, 2023
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from dgoodwin and xueqzhan June 20, 2023 16:11
@dgoodwin
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm

/override ci/prow/e2e

This is broken on the repo I think.

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jun 20, 2023

@dgoodwin: Overrode contexts on behalf of dgoodwin: ci/prow/e2e

In response to this:

/lgtm

/override ci/prow/e2e

This is broken on the repo I think.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jun 20, 2023
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jun 20, 2023

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: DennisPeriquet, dgoodwin

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jun 20, 2023
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jun 20, 2023

@DennisPeriquet: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 50e9070 into openshift:master Jun 20, 2023
16 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants