-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 51
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
MCO-1094: blocked-edges: Declare HighNodeStatusReportFrequency #4965
MCO-1094: blocked-edges: Declare HighNodeStatusReportFrequency #4965
Conversation
@wking: This pull request references MCO-1094 which is a valid jira issue. Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the spike to target the "4.16.0" version, but no target version was set. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
$ hack/show-edges.py fast-4.14 | grep ' 4[.]14[.]14$' | sort -V
4.13.19 -(risks: AWSCustomDomainNodesNotReady, AzureRegistryImagePreservation, HighNodeStatusReportFrequency)-> 4.14.14
4.13.21 -(risks: AWSCustomDomainNodesNotReady, AzureRegistryImagePreservation, HighNodeStatusReportFrequency)-
...
4.13.30 -(risks: AWSCustomDomainNodesNotReady, AzureRegistryImagePreservation, HighNodeStatusReportFrequency)-> 4.14.14
4.13.31 -(risks: AWSCustomDomainNodesNotReady, AzureRegistryImagePreservation, HighNodeStatusReportFrequency)-> 4.14.14
4.13.32 -(risks: AWSCustomDomainNodesNotReady, AzureRegistryImagePreservation, HighNodeStatusReportFrequency)-> 4.14.14
4.13.33 -(risks: AWSCustomDomainNodesNotReady, AzureRegistryImagePreservation)-> 4.14.14
4.13.34 -(risks: AWSCustomDomainNodesNotReady, AzureRegistryImagePreservation)-> 4.14.14
4.13.35 -(risks: AWSCustomDomainNodesNotReady, AzureRegistryImagePreservation)-> 4.14.14
4.14.0 -(risks: HighNodeStatusReportFrequency)-> 4.14.14
...
4.14.9 -(risks: HighNodeStatusReportFrequency)-> 4.14.14
4.14.10 -(risks: HighNodeStatusReportFrequency)-> 4.14.14
4.14.11 -(risks: HighNodeStatusReportFrequency)-> 4.14.14
4.14.12 -> 4.14.14
4.14.13 -> 4.14.14 looks good. |
$ hack/show-edges.py fast-4.13 | grep ' 4[.]13[.]34$' | sort -V
4.12.16 -(risks: AcceleratedNetworkingRace, HighNodeStatusReportFrequency)-> 4.13.34
4.12.17 -(risks: AcceleratedNetworkingRace, HighNodeStatusReportFrequency)-> 4.13.34
...
4.12.48 -(risks: AcceleratedNetworkingRace, HighNodeStatusReportFrequency)-> 4.13.34
4.12.49 -(risks: AcceleratedNetworkingRace, HighNodeStatusReportFrequency)-> 4.13.34
4.12.50 -(risks: AcceleratedNetworkingRace)-> 4.13.34
4.13.0 -(risks: HighNodeStatusReportFrequency)-> 4.13.34
4.13.1 -(risks: HighNodeStatusReportFrequency)-> 4.13.34
4.13.2 -(risks: HighNodeStatusReportFrequency)-> 4.13.34
...
4.13.32 -(risks: HighNodeStatusReportFrequency)-> 4.13.34
4.13.33 -> 4.13.34 Looks good. |
$ hack/show-edges.py candidate-4.12 | grep ' 4[.]12[.]51$' | sort -V
4.11.11 -(risks: HighNodeStatusReportFrequency, RHELKernelHighLoadIOWait)-> 4.12.51
4.11.12 -(risks: HighNodeStatusReportFrequency, RHELKernelHighLoadIOWait)-> 4.12.51
4.11.13 -(risks: HighNodeStatusReportFrequency, RHELKernelHighLoadIOWait)-> 4.12.51
...
4.11.58 -(risks: HighNodeStatusReportFrequency, RHELKernelHighLoadIOWait)-> 4.12.51
4.12.0 -(risks: HighNodeStatusReportFrequency, RHELKernelHighLoadIOWait)-> 4.12.51
4.12.1 -(risks: HighNodeStatusReportFrequency, RHELKernelHighLoadIOWait)-> 4.12.51
...
4.12.49 -(risks: HighNodeStatusReportFrequency, RHELKernelHighLoadIOWait)-> 4.12.51
4.12.50 -(risks: RHELKernelHighLoadIOWait)-> 4.12.51 Also looks good. |
Regressions to 10s occured in: OCPBUGS-15583, 4.15.0 OCPBUGS-28379, 4.14.12 OCPBUGS-29151, 4.13.33 OCPBUGS-29366, 4.12.51 Recovery to 5m occured in: OCPBUGS-29713, 4.16 OCPBUGS-29797, 4.15.2 OCPBUGS-30225, 4.14.16 OCPBUGS-30285, 4.13.37 OCPBUGS-30329, 4.12.53 I don't need to declare risks into 4.15, because 4.15.1 was never added to any channels, and 4.15.0 only has updates from the already-exposed 4.14.14, so updating from there won't make this worse. 4.12.52 was also never added to channels, so it's just 4.12.51 exposed in the 4.12.z.
6357780
to
96eb5f5
Compare
/lgtm |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: sdodson, wking The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
e0c7d2d
into
openshift:master
Regressions to 10s occured in:
OCPBUGS-15583, 4.15.0
OCPBUGS-28379, 4.14.12
OCPBUGS-29151, 4.13.33
OCPBUGS-29366, 4.12.51
Recovery to 5m occured in:
OCPBUGS-29713, 4.16
OCPBUGS-29797, 4.15.2
OCPBUGS-30225, 4.14.16
OCPBUGS-30285, 4.13.37
OCPBUGS-30329, 4.12.53