Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

document using shorter name for Update Service CR #96

Merged

Conversation

PratikMahajan
Copy link
Contributor

@PratikMahajan PratikMahajan commented Jan 19, 2021

In case the user creates the Cincinnati CR with a longer name, there
might be a case where the route's hostname exceeds 63 chars. This will
result in the route not getting created, inturn crashing the operator.

Document using a shorter name for Cincinnati CR to prevent this
issue.

@PratikMahajan PratikMahajan changed the title document using shorter name for Cincinnati CR [WIP]document using shorter name for Cincinnati CR Jan 19, 2021
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Jan 19, 2021
@PratikMahajan PratikMahajan changed the title [WIP]document using shorter name for Cincinnati CR [WIP]document using shorter name for Update Service CR Jan 22, 2021
@PratikMahajan PratikMahajan force-pushed the route-name-too-big branch 2 times, most recently from 11985bf to e3bb4c0 Compare February 2, 2021 16:08
@PratikMahajan PratikMahajan changed the title [WIP]document using shorter name for Update Service CR document using shorter name for Update Service CR Feb 2, 2021
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Feb 2, 2021
In case the user creates the Cincinnati CR with a longer name, there
might be a case where the route's hostname exceeds 63 chars. This will
result in the route not getting created, inturn crashing the operator.

Document using a shorter name, less than 64 characters for Cincinnati CR
to prevent the issue.
Copy link
Member

@wking wking left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: PratikMahajan, wking

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. labels Feb 24, 2021
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit a286c82 into openshift:master Feb 24, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants