Bug 1820421: validate that flavor exists for machine #112
Conversation
openshift-ci-robot
added
the
bugzilla/severity-low
|
@Fedosin: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1820421, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker. 3 validation(s) were run on this bug
In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
openshift-ci-robot
added
bugzilla/valid-bug
|
/test e2e-openstack |
1 similar comment
|
/test e2e-openstack |
|
/lgtm |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: Fedosin, iamemilio The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
|
@Fedosin: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged: openshift/cluster-api-provider-openstack#112. Bugzilla bug 1820421 has been moved to the MODIFIED state. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
* Updated cluster-api for renaming ProviderConfig ... to ProviderSpec openshift#109 * Changed providerConfig to providerSpec also added two little railguards in the actuator, to not panic if there is no `providerSpec.Value`. In theory with this, it is possible to update the controller and edit existing manifests from `providerConfig` to `providerSpec`. * Fixed Gopkg.lock This resulted in removing a couple of corba license files
No description provided.