Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Drop openssh from the image #135

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Nov 5, 2020

Conversation

Fedosin
Copy link

@Fedosin Fedosin commented Nov 4, 2020

We don't need openssh in the image so there is no reason to keep it.

@EmilienM
Copy link
Member

EmilienM commented Nov 5, 2020

/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@EmilienM: changing LGTM is restricted to collaborators

In response to this:

/lgtm

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@EmilienM
Copy link
Member

EmilienM commented Nov 5, 2020

This looks fine. I would also see some doc + a script to make it easier to build CAPO for dev/CI testing; I know you have some handy scripts / tips, maybe we can share them here.

@pierreprinetti
Copy link
Member

If we assume that openssh is irrelevant for testing, is there a reason why we have it in the production Dockerfile?

@Fedosin
Copy link
Author

Fedosin commented Nov 5, 2020

@pierreprinetti to standardize the format whatever it means: #3

We don't need openssh in the image so there is no reason to keep it.
@Fedosin Fedosin changed the title Add testing Dockerfile Drop openssh from the image Nov 5, 2020
@Fedosin
Copy link
Author

Fedosin commented Nov 5, 2020

AWS patch openshift/cluster-api-provider-aws#317

@pierreprinetti
Copy link
Member

/lgtm
/approve

Let's keep an eye on the CI periodics in the coming hours, to make sure everything keeps on working properly.

/cc mandre

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: pierreprinetti

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. labels Nov 5, 2020
Copy link
Member

@mandre mandre left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 548bd4b into openshift:master Nov 5, 2020
pierreprinetti added a commit to shiftstack/cluster-api-provider-openstack that referenced this pull request Dec 21, 2020
openssh is not expected to be useful in the production image.

cf: openshift#135
pierreprinetti added a commit to shiftstack/cluster-api-provider-openstack that referenced this pull request Dec 24, 2020
openssh is not expected to be useful in the production image.

cf: openshift#135
mandre pushed a commit to shiftstack/cluster-api-provider-openstack that referenced this pull request Feb 9, 2021
openssh is not expected to be useful in the production image.

cf: openshift#135
pierreprinetti pushed a commit to shiftstack/cluster-api-provider-openstack that referenced this pull request Apr 22, 2024
This patch changes the following:

  * Use the syntax of mikefarah's yq.
  * Check if the installed yq is a python script and error out if it is.
pierreprinetti pushed a commit to shiftstack/cluster-api-provider-openstack that referenced this pull request Apr 22, 2024
* Re-apply of new yq usage

Just re-applied the usage of yq from openshift#135, because they were overridden
by openshift#141.

* Fixed var names CLOUD to OS_CLOUD
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

6 participants