Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

bump library-go to get context fixes #457

Merged
merged 2 commits into from Jun 24, 2021
Merged

bump library-go to get context fixes #457

merged 2 commits into from Jun 24, 2021

Conversation

mfojtik
Copy link
Member

@mfojtik mfojtik commented Jun 24, 2021

No description provided.

@mfojtik
bump(*): vendor update
851126e 
* openshift/library-go@243fac0c: Bug 1961317: Adding static assets to related objects
* openshift/library-go@8079b117: filter out resources within all alias
* openshift/library-go@ab666164: add test case
* openshift/library-go@12953058: CSI: Unify assetFuncs for all controllers
* openshift/library-go@787aada0: Add generic deployment controller
* openshift/library-go@c20eabe1: csi: Use deployment controller
* openshift/library-go@cf213b14: DeploymentController: Do not overwrite manifest
* openshift/library-go@214ee5f6: apiserver/audit: split policy config map manifest into policy rule slices
* openshift/library-go@3afab922: apiserver/audit: split apart legacy funcs
* openshift/library-go@fd007678: workload controller: delays reporting degraded condition when progressing > 15 minutes
* openshift/library-go@94db8a32: makes the apiservice controller more resilient to failures
* openshift/library-go@2720c7ca: resourcesynccontroller: fix race with informer due to lister-first check
* openshift/library-go@28cb3eea: resource: add context parameter to all resource apply helpers
* openshift/library-go@5542d4fc: operator: adjust controllers to wire context properly
@mfojtik
react to context changes
697a296
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from deads2k and stlaz June 24, 2021 10:45
@s-urbaniak
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jun 24, 2021
@stlaz
Copy link
Member

stlaz commented Jun 24, 2021

/lgtm

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jun 24, 2021

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: mfojtik, s-urbaniak, stlaz

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jun 24, 2021
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jun 24, 2021 •
edited

@mfojtik: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Rerun command
ci/prow/e2e-agnostic-ipv6 697a296 link /test e2e-agnostic-ipv6

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit ae56a0f into openshift:master Jun 24, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@deads2k deads2k Awaiting requested review from deads2k

@stlaz stlaz Awaiting requested review from stlaz

Assignees

@s-urbaniak s-urbaniak

@stlaz stlaz

Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet
5 participants
@mfojtik @s-urbaniak @stlaz @openshift-bot @openshift-merge-robot