Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bug 2037274: pkg/operator#LegacyCNCerts: use increase function #544

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Mar 11, 2022

Conversation

s-urbaniak
Copy link
Contributor

@s-urbaniak s-urbaniak commented Feb 11, 2022

Since counters are monotonic, their values are not reset, hence we have to use the increase function to detect faulty certificates. Here, a window of 30 minutes has been chosen to have a good reaction time after certs have been corrected.

/cc @stlaz

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested a review from stlaz February 11, 2022 09:59
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added bugzilla/severity-urgent Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is urgent for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Feb 11, 2022
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Feb 11, 2022

@s-urbaniak: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2037274, which is invalid:

  • expected the bug to be in one of the following states: NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST, but it is ON_QA instead
  • expected dependent Bugzilla bug 2037272 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENTRELEASE), but it is CLOSED (NOTABUG) instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

Bug 2037274: pkg/operator#LegacyCNCerts: use increase function

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@s-urbaniak
Copy link
Contributor Author

  1. If the Bugzilla associated with the PR has the "FastFix" keyword, the subjective assessment on the issue has already been done and a customer is impacted. These PRs should be prioritized for merge.
    • verified
    • does not apply
  2. The bug has significant impact either through severity, reduction in supportability, or number of users affected.
    • verified
    • does not apply
  3. For branches that are in the Maintenance lifecycle phase:
    • The bug is a critical fix, no reasonable workaround exists, and a recommendation for upgrade has been ruled out, or
    • The bug is a security related bug
    • Branch not in maintenance mode yet (current release + previous release for 90 days after current GA; everything older is in maintenance)
  4. The severity field of the bug must be set to accurately reflect criticality.
    • verified
  5. The PR was created with the cherry-pick bot OR the PR’s description is well formed with user-focused release notes that state the bug number, impact, cause, and resolution. Where appropriate, it should also contain information about how a user can identify whether a particular cluster is affected.
    • verified

@s-urbaniak
Copy link
Contributor Author

/bugzilla refresh

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Feb 11, 2022

@s-urbaniak: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2037274, which is invalid:

  • expected dependent Bugzilla bug 2037272 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENTRELEASE), but it is CLOSED (NOTABUG) instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@s-urbaniak s-urbaniak added the backport-risk-assessed Indicates a PR to a release branch has been evaluated and considered safe to accept. label Feb 11, 2022
@s-urbaniak
Copy link
Contributor Author

/bugzilla refresh

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. and removed bugzilla/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Feb 11, 2022
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Feb 11, 2022

@s-urbaniak: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2037274, which is valid. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

6 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target release (4.9.z) matches configured target release for branch (4.9.z)
  • bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)
  • dependent bug Bugzilla bug 2031839 is in the state VERIFIED, which is one of the valid states (VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENTRELEASE))
  • dependent Bugzilla bug 2031839 targets the "4.10.0" release, which is one of the valid target releases: 4.10.0
  • bug has dependents

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @xingxingxia

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@tkashem
Copy link
Contributor

tkashem commented Feb 11, 2022

/lgtm
/approve

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Feb 11, 2022
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Feb 14, 2022
@stlaz
Copy link
Member

stlaz commented Feb 14, 2022

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Feb 14, 2022
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Feb 14, 2022

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: s-urbaniak, stlaz, tkashem

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Feb 14, 2022
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

1 similar comment
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Feb 14, 2022

@s-urbaniak: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2037274, which is valid.

6 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target release (4.9.z) matches configured target release for branch (4.9.z)
  • bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)
  • dependent bug Bugzilla bug 2031839 is in the state VERIFIED, which is one of the valid states (VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENTRELEASE))
  • dependent Bugzilla bug 2031839 targets the "4.10.0" release, which is one of the valid target releases: 4.10.0
  • bug has dependents

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @xingxingxia

In response to this:

Bug 2037274: pkg/operator#LegacyCNCerts: use increase function

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

1 similar comment
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

8 similar comments
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@stlaz
Copy link
Member

stlaz commented Mar 1, 2022

/hold
e2e-operator test needs to be fixed

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Mar 1, 2022
@s-urbaniak
Copy link
Contributor Author

/hold

@s-urbaniak
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

@s-urbaniak
Copy link
Contributor Author

/hold cancel

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Mar 10, 2022
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

9 similar comments
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Mar 11, 2022

@s-urbaniak: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/e2e-agnostic-ipv6 d1319dc link false /test e2e-agnostic-ipv6

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 086c06f into openshift:release-4.9 Mar 11, 2022
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Mar 11, 2022

@s-urbaniak: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged:

Bugzilla bug 2037274 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

In response to this:

Bug 2037274: pkg/operator#LegacyCNCerts: use increase function

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@s-urbaniak s-urbaniak deleted the increase branch March 14, 2022 12:16
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. backport-risk-assessed Indicates a PR to a release branch has been evaluated and considered safe to accept. bugzilla/severity-urgent Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is urgent for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. cherry-pick-approved Indicates a cherry-pick PR into a release branch has been approved by the release branch manager. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

6 participants