Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bug 1986462: Separate the names of machine os downloader when two copies are started #185

Merged
merged 2 commits into from Jul 29, 2021

Conversation

kirankt
Copy link
Contributor

@kirankt kirankt commented Jul 27, 2021

When specifying both PreProvisioningOSDownloadURLs and ProvisioningOSDownloadURL in the provisioning config CR, CBO will fail to reconcile becasuse two copies of machine-os-downloader init containers with the same name are started. The names of these initcontainers should be different when both of them are spawned together.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added bugzilla/severity-medium Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is medium for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Jul 27, 2021
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jul 27, 2021

@kirankt: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1986462, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target release (4.9.0) matches configured target release for branch (4.9.0)
  • bug is in the state ASSIGNED, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)

No GitHub users were found matching the public email listed for the QA contact in Bugzilla (augol@redhat.com), skipping review request.

In response to this:

Bug 1986462: Separate the names of machine os downloader when two copies are started

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jul 27, 2021

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: kirankt

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from markmc and sadasu July 27, 2021 16:11
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jul 27, 2021
@kirankt
Copy link
Contributor Author

kirankt commented Jul 27, 2021

/test e2e-metal-ipi

Copy link
Contributor

@asalkeld asalkeld left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

can you create a new unit test section like this https://github.com/openshift/cluster-baremetal-operator/blob/master/provisioning/baremetal_pod_test.go#L330-L346
but with the PreProvisioningOSDownloadURLs defined

@kirankt
Copy link
Contributor Author

kirankt commented Jul 28, 2021

can you create a new unit test section like this https://github.com/openshift/cluster-baremetal-operator/blob/master/provisioning/baremetal_pod_test.go#L330-L346
but with the PreProvisioningOSDownloadURLs defined

This PR only deals with the initContainers. We don't really mess with the existing containers in the pod. But I will add a section in the initContainers. Realistically there should be another PR that should validate the preProvisioningOSDownloadURLs and perform unit testing on them.

@kirankt
Copy link
Contributor Author

kirankt commented Jul 28, 2021

/test e2e-agnostic

@kirankt
Copy link
Contributor Author

kirankt commented Jul 28, 2021

/test e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-ipv6

1 similar comment
@kirankt
Copy link
Contributor Author

kirankt commented Jul 28, 2021

/test e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-ipv6

Copy link
Contributor

@sadasu sadasu left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jul 29, 2021
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 0d79d56 into openshift:master Jul 29, 2021
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jul 29, 2021

@kirankt: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged:

Bugzilla bug 1986462 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

In response to this:

Bug 1986462: Separate the names of machine os downloader when two copies are started

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. bugzilla/severity-medium Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is medium for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants