-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 58
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
OCPBUGS-29660: Ignore provisioning ip config if disabled #429
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
@derekhiggins: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-29660, which is invalid:
Comment The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
/jira refresh |
@derekhiggins: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-29660, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. 3 validation(s) were run on this bug
Requesting review from QA contact: In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
2321787
to
95865cb
Compare
/approve |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: derekhiggins, honza The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
/retest-required |
/test e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-virtualmedia |
getProvisioningIPCIDR now returns nil if ProvisioningNetwork is disabled. The external HostIP will then be used (as intended when the prov network is disabled).
95865cb
to
d6299b7
Compare
Just want to double check this, the PR will mean we ignore any provisioning IP when the prov network is disabled, Is this the correct behaviour? Could the user be potentially be providing a Provisioning IP from this situation mentioned in the readme?
|
/retest-required |
@derekhiggins: The following tests failed, say
Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
/hold |
This seems as plausible as anything. |
thanks, unholding |
getProvisioningIPCIDR now returns nil if ProvisioningNetwork is disabled. The external HostIP will then be used (as intended when the prov network is disabled).