Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

OCPBUGS-23308: Set IPFamilyPriority and ExcludeNetworkSubnetCIDR for vSphere IPv6-only #299

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Nov 27, 2023

Conversation

mkowalski
Copy link
Contributor

In 428d639 we have added a support for correctly setting IPFamilyPriority and ExcludeNetworkSubnetCIDR when using dual-stack configuration. That commit however missed the configuration for IPv6-only setups and as a result those clusters are running with IPv4 as a value of IPFamilyPriority.

This PR changes the logic so that we now cover settings for both IPv6-only and dual-stack configurations. There is no need for explicit handling of IPv4-only clusters as those work correctly today.

Fixes: OCPBUGS-23308
Relates-to: OCPBUGS-18641

…vSphere IPv6-only

In 428d639 we have added a support for
correctly setting `IPFamilyPriority` and `ExcludeNetworkSubnetCIDR` when
using dual-stack configuration. That commit however missed the
configuration for IPv6-only setups and as a result those clusters are
running with `IPv4` as a value of `IPFamilyPriority`.

This PR changes the logic so that we now cover settings for both
IPv6-only and dual-stack configurations. There is no need for explicit
handling of IPv4-only clusters as those work correctly today.

Fixes: OCPBUGS-23308
Relates-to: OCPBUGS-18641
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Nov 15, 2023
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@mkowalski: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-23308, which is invalid:

  • expected the bug to target the "4.15.0" version, but no target version was set

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

In response to this:

In 428d639 we have added a support for correctly setting IPFamilyPriority and ExcludeNetworkSubnetCIDR when using dual-stack configuration. That commit however missed the configuration for IPv6-only setups and as a result those clusters are running with IPv4 as a value of IPFamilyPriority.

This PR changes the logic so that we now cover settings for both IPv6-only and dual-stack configurations. There is no need for explicit handling of IPv4-only clusters as those work correctly today.

Fixes: OCPBUGS-23308
Relates-to: OCPBUGS-18641

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@mkowalski
Copy link
Contributor Author

/jira refresh
/cc @JoelSpeed
/cc @rbbratta

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. label Nov 15, 2023
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@mkowalski: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-23308, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target version (4.15.0) matches configured target version for branch (4.15.0)
  • bug is in the state New, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @sunzhaohua2

In response to this:

/jira refresh
/cc @JoelSpeed
/cc @rbbratta

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. label Nov 15, 2023
@mkowalski
Copy link
Contributor Author

/test e2e-vsphere-ovn

Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Nov 15, 2023

@mkowalski: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/e2e-gcp-ovn-ccm c64a5ba link false /test e2e-gcp-ovn-ccm
ci/prow/e2e-openstack-ovn c64a5ba link false /test e2e-openstack-ovn
ci/prow/e2e-azure-ovn c64a5ba link false /test e2e-azure-ovn
ci/prow/e2e-alibaba-ovn c64a5ba link false /test e2e-alibaba-ovn
ci/prow/e2e-azure-ovn-upgrade c64a5ba link false /test e2e-azure-ovn-upgrade

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@mkowalski
Copy link
Contributor Author

e2e-vsphere-ovn passed so there is no regression in IPv4 world. Other failed platforms do not use the modified code so their failures are not relevant

@JoelSpeed
Copy link
Contributor

/approve
/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Nov 20, 2023
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Nov 20, 2023

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: JoelSpeed

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Nov 20, 2023
@openshift-merge-bot openshift-merge-bot bot merged commit 0ce73df into openshift:master Nov 27, 2023
11 of 16 checks passed
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@mkowalski: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-23308: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged:

Jira Issue OCPBUGS-23308 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

In response to this:

In 428d639 we have added a support for correctly setting IPFamilyPriority and ExcludeNetworkSubnetCIDR when using dual-stack configuration. That commit however missed the configuration for IPv6-only setups and as a result those clusters are running with IPv4 as a value of IPFamilyPriority.

This PR changes the logic so that we now cover settings for both IPv6-only and dual-stack configurations. There is no need for explicit handling of IPv4-only clusters as those work correctly today.

Fixes: OCPBUGS-23308
Relates-to: OCPBUGS-18641

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@mkowalski mkowalski deleted the OCPBUGS-23308 branch November 27, 2023 15:00
@openshift-bot
Copy link

[ART PR BUILD NOTIFIER]

This PR has been included in build ose-cluster-cloud-controller-manager-operator-container-v4.15.0-202311272131.p0.g0ce73df.assembly.stream for distgit ose-cluster-cloud-controller-manager-operator.
All builds following this will include this PR.

@openshift-merge-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Fix included in accepted release 4.15.0-0.nightly-2023-11-28-101923

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants