Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[release-4.15] OCPBUGS-34971: Add unreadyNodeGracePeriod for allowing brief node hiccups #299

Conversation

openshift-cherrypick-robot

This is an automated cherry-pick of #294

/assign damdo

/cherrypick release-4.14 release-4.13 release 4.12

unreadyNodeGracePeriod is the period in which
the node is presumed being unready for a reboot (e.g. during upgrades) or a brief hiccup.
This leaves some leeway to avoid immediately reacting on brief node unreadiness.
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-20061 has been cloned as Jira Issue OCPBUGS-34971. Will retitle bug to link to clone.
/retitle [release-4.15] OCPBUGS-34971: Add unreadyNodeGracePeriod for allowing brief node hiccups

In response to this:

This is an automated cherry-pick of #294

/assign damdo

/cherrypick release-4.14 release-4.13 release 4.12

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot changed the title [release-4.15] OCPBUGS-20061: Add unreadyNodeGracePeriod for allowing brief node hiccups [release-4.15] OCPBUGS-34971: Add unreadyNodeGracePeriod for allowing brief node hiccups Jun 5, 2024
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added jira/severity-moderate Referenced Jira bug's severity is moderate for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Jun 5, 2024
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-34971, which is invalid:

  • release note text must be set and not match the template OR release note type must be set to "Release Note Not Required"
  • expected dependent Jira Issue OCPBUGS-20061 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENT RELEASE), CLOSED (DONE), CLOSED (DONE-ERRATA), but it is MODIFIED instead
  • expected dependent Jira Issue OCPBUGS-20061 to target a version in 4.16.0, but it targets "4.17.0" instead

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

In response to this:

This is an automated cherry-pick of #294

/assign damdo

/cherrypick release-4.14 release-4.13 release 4.12

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. label Jun 5, 2024
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from damdo and nrb June 5, 2024 18:36
@damdo
Copy link
Member

damdo commented Jun 6, 2024

/hold
Until the change in 4.17 has been rehearsed for a bit

@damdo
Copy link
Member

damdo commented Jun 6, 2024

/retest

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Jun 6, 2024
@damdo
Copy link
Member

damdo commented Jun 13, 2024

/retest
/jira refresh

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@damdo: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-34971, which is invalid:

  • release note text must be set and not match the template OR release note type must be set to "Release Note Not Required"
  • expected dependent Jira Issue OCPBUGS-20061 to target a version in 4.16.0, but it targets "4.17.0" instead

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

/retest
/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@damdo
Copy link
Member

damdo commented Jun 13, 2024

/cherry-pick release-4.14 release-4.13 release-4.12

@openshift-cherrypick-robot
Copy link
Author

@damdo: once the present PR merges, I will cherry-pick it on top of release-4.14 in a new PR and assign it to you.

In response to this:

/cherry-pick release-4.14 release-4.13 release-4.12

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@damdo
Copy link
Member

damdo commented Jun 14, 2024

/jira refresh
/label backport-risk-assessed

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the backport-risk-assessed Indicates a PR to a release branch has been evaluated and considered safe to accept. label Jun 14, 2024
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@damdo: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-34971, which is invalid:

  • release note text must be set and not match the template OR release note type must be set to "Release Note Not Required"
  • expected dependent Jira Issue OCPBUGS-20061 to target a version in 4.16.0, but it targets "4.17.0" instead

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

/jira refresh
/label backport-risk-assessed

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@damdo
Copy link
Member

damdo commented Jun 14, 2024

/jira refresh

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@damdo: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-34971, which is invalid:

  • release note text must be set and not match the template OR release note type must be set to "Release Note Not Required"

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@damdo
Copy link
Member

damdo commented Jun 14, 2024

/jira refresh

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. label Jun 14, 2024
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. label Jun 14, 2024
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@damdo: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-34971, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state.

7 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target version (4.15.z) matches configured target version for branch (4.15.z)
  • bug is in the state ASSIGNED, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)
  • release note text is set and does not match the template
  • dependent bug Jira Issue OCPBUGS-34970 is in the state Verified, which is one of the valid states (VERIFIED, RELEASE PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENT RELEASE), CLOSED (DONE), CLOSED (DONE-ERRATA))
  • dependent Jira Issue OCPBUGS-34970 targets the "4.16.0" version, which is one of the valid target versions: 4.16.0
  • bug has dependents

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @sunzhaohua2

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested a review from sunzhaohua2 June 14, 2024 08:45
@damdo
Copy link
Member

damdo commented Jun 14, 2024

/cc @miyadav

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested a review from miyadav June 14, 2024 08:46
@damdo
Copy link
Member

damdo commented Jun 14, 2024

/retest

Copy link
Member

@damdo damdo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

/assign @JoelSpeed

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jun 14, 2024
@JoelSpeed
Copy link
Contributor

/approve

Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jun 14, 2024

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: JoelSpeed

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jun 14, 2024
@sunzhaohua2
Copy link

/label cherry-pick-approved

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the cherry-pick-approved Indicates a cherry-pick PR into a release branch has been approved by the release branch manager. label Jun 17, 2024
@damdo
Copy link
Member

damdo commented Jun 19, 2024

/unhold

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Jun 19, 2024
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD c9afc05 and 2 for PR HEAD 9f4fddd in total

Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jun 19, 2024

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@openshift-merge-bot openshift-merge-bot bot merged commit 603c1bc into openshift:release-4.15 Jun 19, 2024
25 checks passed
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-34971: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged:

Jira Issue OCPBUGS-34971 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

In response to this:

This is an automated cherry-pick of #294

/assign damdo

/cherrypick release-4.14 release-4.13 release 4.12

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-cherrypick-robot
Copy link
Author

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: #299 failed to apply on top of branch "release-4.14":

Applying: add unreadyNodeGracePeriod for allowing brief node hiccups
Using index info to reconstruct a base tree...
M	pkg/machineproviders/providers/openshift/machine/v1beta1/provider.go
M	pkg/machineproviders/providers/openshift/machine/v1beta1/provider_test.go
Falling back to patching base and 3-way merge...
Auto-merging pkg/machineproviders/providers/openshift/machine/v1beta1/provider_test.go
Auto-merging pkg/machineproviders/providers/openshift/machine/v1beta1/provider.go
CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in pkg/machineproviders/providers/openshift/machine/v1beta1/provider.go
error: Failed to merge in the changes.
hint: Use 'git am --show-current-patch=diff' to see the failed patch
Patch failed at 0001 add unreadyNodeGracePeriod for allowing brief node hiccups
When you have resolved this problem, run "git am --continue".
If you prefer to skip this patch, run "git am --skip" instead.
To restore the original branch and stop patching, run "git am --abort".

In response to this:

This is an automated cherry-pick of #294

/assign damdo

/cherrypick release-4.14 release-4.13 release 4.12

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

[ART PR BUILD NOTIFIER]

This PR has been included in build ose-cluster-control-plane-machine-set-operator-container-v4.15.0-202406191706.p0.g603c1bc.assembly.stream.el9 for distgit ose-cluster-control-plane-machine-set-operator.
All builds following this will include this PR.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. backport-risk-assessed Indicates a PR to a release branch has been evaluated and considered safe to accept. cherry-pick-approved Indicates a cherry-pick PR into a release branch has been approved by the release branch manager. jira/severity-moderate Referenced Jira bug's severity is moderate for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

9 participants