Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bug 1815552: Move operator & operand to different namespaces #32

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Mar 24, 2020

Conversation

jsafrane
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-cluster-storage-operators for the operator
openshift-cluster-storage-controllers for the operand

openshift-cluster-storage-operators for the operator
openshift-cluster-storage-controllers for the operand
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: jsafrane

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Mar 24, 2020
@jsafrane
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

@jsafrane jsafrane changed the title Move operator & operand to different namespaces Bug 1815552: Move operator & operand to different namespaces Mar 24, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@jsafrane: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1815552, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target release (4.5.0) matches configured target release for branch (4.5.0)
  • bug is in the state ASSIGNED, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)

In response to this:

Bug 1815552: Move operator & operand to different namespaces

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. label Mar 24, 2020
@huffmanca
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Mar 24, 2020
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 73fed9c into openshift:master Mar 24, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@jsafrane: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged. Bugzilla bug 1815552 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

In response to this:

Bug 1815552: Move operator & operand to different namespaces

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@jsafrane
Copy link
Contributor Author

/cherry-pick release-4.4

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@jsafrane: #32 failed to apply on top of branch "release-4.4":

error: Failed to merge in the changes.
Using index info to reconstruct a base tree...
A	test/e2e/operator_test.go
Falling back to patching base and 3-way merge...
CONFLICT (modify/delete): test/e2e/operator_test.go deleted in HEAD and modified in Move operator & operand to different namespaces. Version Move operator & operand to different namespaces of test/e2e/operator_test.go left in tree.
Patch failed at 0001 Move operator & operand to different namespaces

In response to this:

/cherry-pick release-4.4

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants