New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Bug 1992555: Comply with Openshift alerting guidelines #288
Merged
openshift-merge-robot
merged 1 commit into
openshift:master
from
lmzuccarelli:BZ1992555
Aug 19, 2021
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Does
description
supersedemessage
? The alerting-consistency enhancement document doesn't say whethermessage
is still needed or not, so if you don't know the answer, we can ask the document's author for clarification or examples.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good point, I used the cluster-etcd-operator as an example, they did not have 'message'. I will look into the document and ask if need be.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The documentation mentions this
Documentation Required
So it looks like
summary
&description
are mandatory. I will ask aboutmessage
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
From the #forum-monitoring "it hasn't been superseded, but there was a consensus upstream to use summary and description in favor of message in order to have multiple level of abstraction" this is what upstream recommends: https://github.com/monitoring-mixins/docs#guidelines-for-alert-names-labels-and-annotations. So I think we can drop the message annotation.