Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[release-4.9] OCPBUGS-7982: fail early on missing node status envs #1015

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Mar 2, 2023

Conversation

tjungblu
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Feb 27, 2023

@tjungblu: No Bugzilla bug is referenced in the title of this pull request.
To reference a bug, add 'Bug XXX:' to the title of this pull request and request another bug refresh with /bugzilla refresh.

In response to this:

[release-4.9] fail early on missing node status envs

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@tjungblu
Copy link
Contributor Author

/jira clone OCPBUGS-7741

@tjungblu
Copy link
Contributor Author

/jira clone OCPBUGS-7741

@tjungblu
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retitle [release-4.9] OCPBUGS-7982: fail early on missing node status envs #1015

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot changed the title [release-4.9] fail early on missing node status envs [release-4.9] OCPBUGS-7982: fail early on missing node status envs #1015 Feb 27, 2023
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Feb 27, 2023

@tjungblu: No Bugzilla bug is referenced in the title of this pull request.
To reference a bug, add 'Bug XXX:' to the title of this pull request and request another bug refresh with /bugzilla refresh.

In response to this:

[release-4.9] OCPBUGS-7982: fail early on missing node status envs #1015

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added jira/severity-moderate Referenced Jira bug's severity is moderate for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Feb 27, 2023
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@tjungblu: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-7982, which is invalid:

  • expected dependent Jira Issue OCPBUGS-7741 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENT RELEASE), CLOSED (DONE), but it is ON_QA instead

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@tjungblu
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retitle [release-4.9] OCPBUGS-7982: fail early on missing node status envs

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot changed the title [release-4.9] OCPBUGS-7982: fail early on missing node status envs #1015 [release-4.9] OCPBUGS-7982: fail early on missing node status envs Feb 27, 2023
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Feb 27, 2023

@tjungblu: No Bugzilla bug is referenced in the title of this pull request.
To reference a bug, add 'Bug XXX:' to the title of this pull request and request another bug refresh with /bugzilla refresh.

In response to this:

[release-4.9] OCPBUGS-7982: fail early on missing node status envs

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@tjungblu
Copy link
Contributor Author

/jira refresh

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. and removed jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Feb 27, 2023
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@tjungblu: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-7982, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state.

6 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target version (4.9.z) matches configured target version for branch (4.9.z)
  • bug is in the state New, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)
  • dependent bug Jira Issue OCPBUGS-7741 is in the state Verified, which is one of the valid states (VERIFIED, RELEASE PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENT RELEASE), CLOSED (DONE))
  • dependent Jira Issue OCPBUGS-7741 targets the "4.10.z" version, which is one of the valid target versions: 4.10.0, 4.10.z
  • bug has dependents

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @geliu2016

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@tjungblu
Copy link
Contributor Author

@dusk125 I would also need BPA+approval here please :)

@dusk125
Copy link
Contributor

dusk125 commented Feb 27, 2023

/approve
/label backport-risk-assessed

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added backport-risk-assessed Indicates a PR to a release branch has been evaluated and considered safe to accept. approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. labels Feb 27, 2023
Copy link

@geliu2016 geliu2016 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/label cherry-pick-approved

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the cherry-pick-approved Indicates a cherry-pick PR into a release branch has been approved by the release branch manager. label Feb 28, 2023
@Elbehery
Copy link
Contributor

Elbehery commented Mar 1, 2023

/lgtm
/approve

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Mar 1, 2023
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Mar 1, 2023

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: dusk125, Elbehery, geliu2016, tjungblu

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 674fd06 and 2 for PR HEAD 0faae20 in total

@tjungblu
Copy link
Contributor Author

tjungblu commented Mar 1, 2023

/retest-required

6 similar comments
@tjungblu
Copy link
Contributor Author

tjungblu commented Mar 1, 2023

/retest-required

@tjungblu
Copy link
Contributor Author

tjungblu commented Mar 1, 2023

/retest-required

@tjungblu
Copy link
Contributor Author

tjungblu commented Mar 2, 2023

/retest-required

@tjungblu
Copy link
Contributor Author

tjungblu commented Mar 2, 2023

/retest-required

@tjungblu
Copy link
Contributor Author

tjungblu commented Mar 2, 2023

/retest-required

@Elbehery
Copy link
Contributor

Elbehery commented Mar 2, 2023

/retest-required

@dusk125
Copy link
Contributor

dusk125 commented Mar 2, 2023

/override ci/prow/e2e-agnostic

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Mar 2, 2023

@dusk125: Overrode contexts on behalf of dusk125: ci/prow/e2e-agnostic

In response to this:

/override ci/prow/e2e-agnostic

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 0d48ce4 into openshift:release-4.9 Mar 2, 2023
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@tjungblu: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged:

Jira Issue OCPBUGS-7982 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@tjungblu tjungblu deleted the 49_envstatus branch March 2, 2023 15:59
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

[ART PR BUILD NOTIFIER]

This PR has been included in build cluster-etcd-operator-container-v4.9.0-202311250023.p0.g0d48ce4.assembly.stream for distgit cluster-etcd-operator.
All builds following this will include this PR.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. backport-risk-assessed Indicates a PR to a release branch has been evaluated and considered safe to accept. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. cherry-pick-approved Indicates a cherry-pick PR into a release branch has been approved by the release branch manager. jira/severity-moderate Referenced Jira bug's severity is moderate for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

7 participants