New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
NO-JIRA: bump library-go and use default UnhealthyPodEvictionPolicy #1171
NO-JIRA: bump library-go and use default UnhealthyPodEvictionPolicy #1171
Conversation
etcd should use a default UnhealthyPodEvictionPolicy behavior corresponding to the IfHealthyBudget policy. This policy achieves the least amount of disruption, as it does not allow eviction when multiple etcd pods do not report readiness. This can block node drain/maintenance. The cluster administrator should then analyze these pods and decide which one to bring down manually.
/retest |
4 similar comments
/retest |
/retest |
/retest |
/retest |
/retest-required |
/retest-required |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: atiratree, dusk125 The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
This test is being made optional openshift/release#47252 |
@dusk125: Overrode contexts on behalf of dusk125: ci/prow/e2e-gcp-qe-no-capabilities In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
/retitle NO-JIRA: bump library-go and use default UnhealthyPodEvictionPolicy This PR bumps library-go only. The change under pkg/operator/starter.go reflects the new API which is no-op for this operator. |
@atiratree: This pull request explicitly references no jira issue. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
@atiratree: The following test failed, say
Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
/retest-required |
a13dff1
into
openshift:master
[ART PR BUILD NOTIFIER] This PR has been included in build cluster-etcd-operator-container-v4.16.0-202401100232.p0.ga13dff1.assembly.stream for distgit cluster-etcd-operator. |
etcd should use a default UnhealthyPodEvictionPolicy behavior corresponding to the
IfHealthyBudget policy. This policy achieves the least amount of disruption, as it
does not allow eviction when multiple etcd pods do not report readiness.
This can block node drain/maintenance. The cluster administrator should then
analyze these pods and decide which one to bring down manually.
As opposed to for example to kube-apiserver that can use more permissive eviction policy: openshift/cluster-kube-apiserver-operator#1579