Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bug 1804751: remove guard budget controller #165

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Feb 19, 2020

Conversation

alaypatel07
Copy link
Contributor

@alaypatel07 alaypatel07 commented Feb 18, 2020

This removes the guard budget controller and defers moving
the quorum guard to CEO namespace to the future.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. label Feb 18, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Feb 18, 2020
@alaypatel07
Copy link
Contributor Author

level=error
level=error msg="Error: Error applying IAM policy to project \"openshift-gce-devel-ci\": Too many conflicts.  Latest error: Error setting IAM policy for project \"openshift-gce-devel-ci\": googleapi: Error 409: There were concurrent policy changes. Please retry the whole read-modify-write with exponential backoff., aborted"
level=error
level=error msg="  on ../tmp/openshift-install-136644694/iam/main.tf line 11, in resource \"google_project_iam_member\" \"worker-storage-admin\":"
level=error msg="  11: resource \"google_project_iam_member\" \"worker-storage-admin\" {"
level=error
level=error

infra

/test e2e-gcp

@deads2k
Copy link
Contributor

deads2k commented Feb 18, 2020

/retest

@hexfusion
Copy link
Contributor

I am fine with this but understand by not replacing quorum-gaurd we still race to provide certs before we Alert. MCO is before CEO in CVO payload. With all we have done I am not why we don't just do this but we do have a lot of fish to fry.

LGTM

@alaypatel07 alaypatel07 changed the title [test]: make existing quorum guard work Bug 1804751: make existing quorum guard work Feb 19, 2020
@alaypatel07 alaypatel07 changed the title Bug 1804751: make existing quorum guard work Bug 1804751: remove guard budget controller Feb 19, 2020
@hexfusion
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the bugzilla/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. label Feb 19, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@alaypatel07: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1804751, which is invalid:

  • expected the bug to target the "4.5.0" release, but it targets "---" instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

Bug 1804751: remove guard budget controller

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

3 similar comments
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@alaypatel07: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1804751, which is invalid:

  • expected the bug to target the "4.5.0" release, but it targets "---" instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

Bug 1804751: remove guard budget controller

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@alaypatel07: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1804751, which is invalid:

  • expected the bug to target the "4.5.0" release, but it targets "---" instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

Bug 1804751: remove guard budget controller

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@alaypatel07: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1804751, which is invalid:

  • expected the bug to target the "4.5.0" release, but it targets "---" instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

Bug 1804751: remove guard budget controller

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Feb 19, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: alaypatel07, hexfusion

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
  • OWNERS [alaypatel07,hexfusion]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

2 similar comments
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: alaypatel07, hexfusion

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
  • OWNERS [alaypatel07,hexfusion]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: alaypatel07, hexfusion

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
  • OWNERS [alaypatel07,hexfusion]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@hexfusion
Copy link
Contributor

/bugzilla refresh

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@hexfusion: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1804751, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. and removed bugzilla/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Feb 19, 2020
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit a9d1979 into openshift:master Feb 19, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@alaypatel07: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged. Bugzilla bug 1804751 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

In response to this:

Bug 1804751: remove guard budget controller

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@alaypatel07
Copy link
Contributor Author

/cherrypick release-4.4

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@alaypatel07: #165 failed to apply on top of branch "release-4.4":

error: Failed to merge in the changes.
Using index info to reconstruct a base tree...
M	pkg/operator/guardbudget/guard_budget_controller.go
M	pkg/operator/starter.go
Falling back to patching base and 3-way merge...
Auto-merging pkg/operator/starter.go
CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in pkg/operator/starter.go
CONFLICT (modify/delete): pkg/operator/guardbudget/guard_budget_controller.go deleted in remove guard_budget_congroller and modified in HEAD. Version HEAD of pkg/operator/guardbudget/guard_budget_controller.go left in tree.
Removing manifests/0000_12_etcd-operator_09_etcdquorumguard_deployment.yaml
Removing manifests/0000_12_etcd-operator_08_etcdquorumguard_pdb.yaml
Removing manifests/0000_12_etcd-operator_00_pdb-rolebinding.yaml
Patch failed at 0001 remove guard_budget_congroller

In response to this:

/cherrypick release-4.4

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@deads2k
Copy link
Contributor

deads2k commented Feb 20, 2020

/cherrypick release-4.4

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@deads2k: #165 failed to apply on top of branch "release-4.4":

error: Failed to merge in the changes.
Using index info to reconstruct a base tree...
M	pkg/operator/starter.go
Falling back to patching base and 3-way merge...
Auto-merging pkg/operator/starter.go
CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in pkg/operator/starter.go
Removing pkg/operator/guardbudget/guard_budget_controller.go
Removing manifests/0000_12_etcd-operator_09_etcdquorumguard_deployment.yaml
Removing manifests/0000_12_etcd-operator_08_etcdquorumguard_pdb.yaml
Removing manifests/0000_12_etcd-operator_00_pdb-rolebinding.yaml
Patch failed at 0001 remove guard_budget_congroller

In response to this:

/cherrypick release-4.4

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

6 participants