Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Bug 1809732: cluster-etcd-operator: upgrades show "etcd member is unavailable" #225

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from
Closed

Bug 1809732: cluster-etcd-operator: upgrades show "etcd member is unavailable" #225

wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

sanchezl
Copy link
Contributor

@sanchezl sanchezl commented Mar 2, 2020

No description provided.

@sanchezl sanchezl changed the title etcd dns not resolved on upgrade WIP: etcd dns not resolved on upgrade Mar 2, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. labels Mar 2, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Mar 2, 2020
@sanchezl sanchezl changed the title WIP: etcd dns not resolved on upgrade etcd dns not resolved on upgrade Mar 3, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Mar 3, 2020
@deads2k
Copy link
Contributor

deads2k commented Mar 3, 2020

@sanchezl for debugging? If so, write a bug and get this merged.

@sanchezl sanchezl changed the title etcd dns not resolved on upgrade Bug 1809732: cluster-etcd-operator: upgrades show "etcd member is unavailable" Mar 3, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@sanchezl: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1809732, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target release (4.5.0) matches configured target release for branch (4.5.0)
  • bug is in the state NEW, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)

In response to this:

Bug 1809732: cluster-etcd-operator: upgrades show "etcd member is unavailable"

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. label Mar 3, 2020
hexfusion
hexfusion approved these changes Mar 3, 2020
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@hexfusion hexfusion left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Mar 3, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: hexfusion, sanchezl

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Mar 3, 2020
@hexfusion
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

7 similar comments
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@hexfusion hexfusion mentioned this pull request Mar 4, 2020
Closed
37 tasks
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

7 similar comments
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@deads2k
Copy link
Contributor

deads2k commented Mar 4, 2020

/hold

this will flap the kas-o configuration on consumption. Logging good, flapping bad.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Mar 4, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@sanchezl: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Rerun command
ci/prow/e2e-aws 388314f link /test e2e-aws
ci/prow/e2e-gcp 388314f link /test e2e-gcp
ci/prow/e2e-azure 388314f link /test e2e-azure

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Please help us cut down on flakes by linking to an open issue when you hit one in your PR.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@sanchezl
Copy link
Contributor Author

sanchezl commented Mar 5, 2020

Superseded by #229

@sanchezl sanchezl closed this Mar 5, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Mar 5, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@sanchezl: PR needs rebase.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@hexfusion hexfusion hexfusion approved these changes

@alaypatel07 alaypatel07 Awaiting requested review from alaypatel07

@mfojtik mfojtik Awaiting requested review from mfojtik

Assignees

@hexfusion hexfusion

Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet
5 participants
@sanchezl @deads2k @openshift-ci-robot @hexfusion @openshift-bot