Bug 1850057: etcd-pod: Use ionice -c2 -n0 #418
Conversation
This will have no currect effect with the default I/O scheduler of `mq-deadline`, but I think it will help once we switch to `bfq` as part of openshift/machine-config-operator#1946
|
I just have one outstanding question regarding ionice. openshift/machine-config-operator#1957 (comment) |
|
Let's get this merged in combination with openshift/machine-config-operator#1957 ? |
cgwalters
changed the title
openshift-ci-robot
added
the
bugzilla/severity-high
|
@cgwalters: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1850057, which is valid. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker. 3 validation(s) were run on this bug
In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
openshift-ci-robot
added
the
bugzilla/valid-bug
|
OK, this one should be good to go! |
|
/lgtm |
|
/retest |
openshift-ci-robot
added
lgtm
|
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
|
/refresh |
|
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
9 similar comments
|
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
|
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
|
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
|
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
|
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
|
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
|
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
|
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
|
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
|
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
12 similar comments
|
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
|
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
|
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
|
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
|
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
|
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
|
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
|
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
|
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
|
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
|
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
|
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
|
/lgtm cancel |
Filed openshift/openshift-tests#68 for that if someone wants to take it. |
|
Ah I think this is related to openshift/release@151d520 - e2e-aws-disruptive is obsolete. |
|
OK so now that I'm not off on a wild goose chase and am looking at the right e2e-disruptive test...hm, seems generally broken right now. There's not many runs for that test - do you all consider it blocking? I'd like to get this one in because the BZ is tracking it. |
|
/refresh |
|
/test e2e-disruptive |
|
/lgtm |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: hexfusion The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
|
/skip |
|
/refresh |
generally no and certainly not for this change. |
|
@cgwalters: The following tests failed, say
Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
|
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
|
@cgwalters: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged: Bugzilla bug 1850057 has been moved to the MODIFIED state. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
This will have no currect effect with the default I/O scheduler
of
mq-deadline, but I think it will help once we switch tobfqas part of openshift/machine-config-operator#1946