Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add summary tables to tls asset docs #529

Merged
merged 2 commits into from Jan 26, 2021

Conversation

marun
Copy link
Contributor

@marun marun commented Jan 19, 2021

No description provided.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Jan 19, 2021
| | etcd-serving-ca | openshift-etcd |
| etcd-metric-signer | etcd-metric-serving-ca | openshift-etcd/etcd-metrics-proxy-client-ca |
| | | openshift-etcd/etcd-metrics-proxy-serving-ca |
| (bootstrap signer) | initial-etcd-signer | |
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This really isn't a separate CA we just reuse[1] etcd-signer based TLS assets generated by the installer.

https://github.com/openshift/cluster-etcd-operator/blob/release-4.7/pkg/cmd/render/render.go#L129

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I screwed up the name, it's initial-etcd-ca not signer (fixed). I'm not sure what you mean by this not being a separate CA - it's a ca bundle (i.e. stored in a configmap) and presumably used to validate certs issued by the installer CA. Any ideas why it still exists after install?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

gotcha yeah it was cruft ported over from KAS-O. we removed it in 4.7[1]

[1] #501

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

So we can remove that line then, or mark removed after 4.7?

Copy link
Contributor Author

@marun marun Jan 26, 2021

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Removed

@hexfusion
Copy link
Contributor

small nit otherwise 🚀 yay MOAR docs!

@marun marun changed the title WIP Add summary tables to tls asset docs Add summary tables to tls asset docs Jan 26, 2021
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Jan 26, 2021
@marun
Copy link
Contributor Author

marun commented Jan 26, 2021

@hexfusion Can we just add bugzilla/valid-bug? Having to add a tracking bug for a non-functional doc addition that requires zero qa oversight does not seem reasonable.

@hexfusion
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm

@hexfusion
Copy link
Contributor

/approve

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jan 26, 2021
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: hexfusion, marun

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@hexfusion hexfusion added the bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. label Jan 26, 2021
@hexfusion
Copy link
Contributor

manually adding BZ tag as this is non code change.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jan 26, 2021
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

2 similar comments
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit d951824 into openshift:master Jan 26, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants