Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Bug 2003540: bump library-go #663

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Oct 14, 2021
Merged

Bug 2003540: bump library-go #663

merged 1 commit into from Oct 14, 2021

Conversation

aojea
Copy link
Contributor

@aojea aojea commented Sep 16, 2021

Signed-off-by: Antonio Ojea aojea@redhat.com

bump lirbary-go
24f61e8 
Signed-off-by: Antonio Ojea <aojea@redhat.com>
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added bugzilla/severity-high Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is high for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Sep 16, 2021
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Sep 16, 2021

@aojea: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2003538, which is invalid:

  • expected the bug to target the "4.9.0" release, but it targets "4.9.z" instead
  • expected dependent Bugzilla bug 2003540 to target a release in 4.10.0, but it targets "4.9.0" instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

Bug 2003538: bump library-go

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@aojea aojea changed the title Bug 2003538: bump library-go Bug 2003540: bump library-go Sep 17, 2021
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Sep 17, 2021

@aojea: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2003540, which is invalid:

  • expected the bug to target the "4.9.0" release, but it targets "4.9.z" instead
  • expected the bug to be in one of the following states: NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST, but it is ON_QA instead
  • expected dependent Bugzilla bug 2001856 to be in one of the following states: MODIFIED, ON_QA, VERIFIED, but it is ASSIGNED instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

Bug 2003540: bump library-go

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@aojea
Copy link
Contributor Author

aojea commented Sep 20, 2021

/assign @sttts @hexfusion
/retest

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Sep 20, 2021

@aojea: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/e2e-gcp-five-control-plane-replicas 24f61e8 link false /test e2e-gcp-five-control-plane-replicas

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@hexfusion
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Sep 20, 2021
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Sep 20, 2021

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: aojea, hexfusion

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Sep 20, 2021
@hexfusion
Copy link
Contributor

/bugzilla refresh

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Sep 20, 2021

@hexfusion: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2003540, which is invalid:

  • expected dependent Bugzilla bug 2001856 to be in one of the following states: MODIFIED, ON_QA, VERIFIED, but it is ASSIGNED instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

11 similar comments
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

1 similar comment
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@hexfusion
Copy link
Contributor

/skip

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Sep 22, 2021

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2003540, which is invalid:

  • expected the bug to target the "4.9.0" release, but it targets "4.9.z" instead
  • expected dependent Bugzilla bug 2001856 to be in one of the following states: MODIFIED, ON_QA, VERIFIED, but it is ASSIGNED instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Sep 23, 2021

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2003540, which is invalid:

  • expected the bug to target the "4.9.0" release, but it targets "4.9.z" instead
  • expected dependent Bugzilla bug 2001856 to be in one of the following states: MODIFIED, ON_QA, VERIFIED, but it is ASSIGNED instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Sep 24, 2021

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2003540, which is invalid:

  • expected dependent Bugzilla bug 2001856 to be in one of the following states: MODIFIED, ON_QA, VERIFIED, but it is ASSIGNED instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Sep 25, 2021

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2003540, which is invalid:

  • expected dependent Bugzilla bug 2001856 to be in one of the following states: MODIFIED, ON_QA, VERIFIED, but it is ASSIGNED instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Sep 26, 2021

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2003540, which is invalid:

  • expected dependent Bugzilla bug 2001856 to be in one of the following states: MODIFIED, ON_QA, VERIFIED, but it is ASSIGNED instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Sep 27, 2021

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2003540, which is invalid:

  • expected dependent Bugzilla bug 2001856 to be in one of the following states: MODIFIED, ON_QA, VERIFIED, but it is ASSIGNED instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Sep 28, 2021

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2003540, which is invalid:

  • expected dependent Bugzilla bug 2001856 to be in one of the following states: MODIFIED, ON_QA, VERIFIED, but it is ASSIGNED instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Sep 29, 2021

@openshift-bot: An error was encountered adding this pull request to the external tracker bugs for bug 2003540 on the Bugzilla server at https://bugzilla.redhat.com. No known errors were detected, please see the full error message for details.

Full error message. JSONRPC error 32000: Red Hat Bugzilla's database reported a query serialization error. Most likely this occurred because another user or process attempted to change the same data that you were attempting to change. Please press Back and retry the transaction. 
 UPDATE bugs SET delta_ts = ? WHERE bug_id = ? at /var/www/html/bugzilla/Bugzilla/Bug.pm line 1517.

Please contact an administrator to resolve this issue, then request a bug refresh with /bugzilla refresh.

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@aojea
Copy link
Contributor Author

aojea commented Sep 29, 2021

/bugzilla refresh

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Sep 29, 2021

@aojea: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2003540, which is valid. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

6 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target release (4.9.0) matches configured target release for branch (4.9.0)
  • bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)
  • dependent bug Bugzilla bug 2001856 is in the state VERIFIED, which is one of the valid states (MODIFIED, ON_QA, VERIFIED)
  • dependent Bugzilla bug 2001856 targets the "4.10.0" release, which is one of the valid target releases: 4.10.0
  • bug has dependents

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @gangwgr

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. and removed bugzilla/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Sep 29, 2021
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested a review from gangwgr September 29, 2021 10:36
@sdodson sdodson added the staff-eng-approved Indicates a release branch PR has been approved by a staff engineer (formerly group/pillar lead). label Oct 14, 2021
This was referenced Oct 14, 2021
Merged
Merged
Merged
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit dd596d4 into openshift:release-4.9 Oct 14, 2021
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 14, 2021

@aojea: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged:

Bugzilla bug 2003540 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

In response to this:

Bug 2003540: bump library-go

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@hexfusion hexfusion Awaiting requested review from hexfusion

@ironcladlou ironcladlou Awaiting requested review from ironcladlou

@gangwgr gangwgr Awaiting requested review from gangwgr

Assignees

@sttts sttts

@hexfusion hexfusion

Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. bugzilla/severity-high Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is high for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. staff-eng-approved Indicates a release branch PR has been approved by a staff engineer (formerly group/pillar lead).
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet
6 participants
@aojea @hexfusion @openshift-bot @sdodson @sttts @openshift-merge-robot