Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bug 1785115: tolerate all NoSchedule taints #421

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Jan 6, 2020

Conversation

dmage
Copy link
Member

@dmage dmage commented Dec 19, 2019

/assign @adambkaplan

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. label Dec 19, 2019
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@dmage: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1785115, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

In response to this:

Bug 1785115: tolerate all NoSchedule taints

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. label Dec 19, 2019
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Dec 19, 2019
Copy link
Contributor

@adambkaplan adambkaplan left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Since there's a BZ I'd like to see a test for this - either a unit test or an e2e. I can see the latter being a bit harder to pull off.

@dmage
Copy link
Member Author

dmage commented Dec 19, 2019

@adambkaplan do you want a unit test that checks that daemonset has a pod template spec with the same tolerations as we have it in the template?

@adambkaplan
Copy link
Contributor

do you want a unit test that checks that daemonset has a pod template spec with the same tolerations as we have it in the template?

@dmage works for me. Per the kube docs, removing the key means the CA daemonset should schedule on every node [1]

[1] https://kubernetes.io/docs/concepts/configuration/taint-and-toleration/

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Jan 6, 2020
@dmage
Copy link
Member Author

dmage commented Jan 6, 2020

@adambkaplan ptal

Copy link
Contributor

@adambkaplan adambkaplan left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jan 6, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: adambkaplan, dmage

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 3138e3a into openshift:master Jan 6, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@dmage: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged. Bugzilla bug 1785115 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

In response to this:

Bug 1785115: tolerate all NoSchedule taints

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@adambkaplan
Copy link
Contributor

/cherrypick release-4.3

@adambkaplan
Copy link
Contributor

/cherrypick release-4.2

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@adambkaplan: new pull request created: #472

In response to this:

/cherrypick release-4.3

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@adambkaplan: new pull request created: #473

In response to this:

/cherrypick release-4.2

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

6 participants