Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bug 1770677: upstream the dnsrecord type #360

Merged

Conversation

ironcladlou
Copy link
Contributor

@ironcladlou ironcladlou commented Feb 12, 2020

Depends on openshift/api#584

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Feb 12, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@ironcladlou: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1770677, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

In response to this:

WIP: Bug 1770677: upstream the dnsrecord type

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. size/XXL Denotes a PR that changes 1000+ lines, ignoring generated files. labels Feb 12, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@ironcladlou: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1770677, which is valid.

In response to this:

WIP: Bug 1770677: upstream the dnsrecord type

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Feb 12, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added size/XL Denotes a PR that changes 500-999 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. size/XXL Denotes a PR that changes 1000+ lines, ignoring generated files. labels Feb 13, 2020
@ironcladlou ironcladlou changed the title WIP: Bug 1770677: upstream the dnsrecord type Bug 1770677: upstream the dnsrecord type Feb 17, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Feb 17, 2020
@ironcladlou
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

@ironcladlou
Copy link
Contributor Author

@Miciah @danehans @frobware PTAL

@ironcladlou
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

@@ -9,8 +9,8 @@ import (

operatorv1 "github.com/openshift/api/operator/v1"

iov1 "github.com/openshift/cluster-ingress-operator/pkg/api/v1"
ingresscontroller "github.com/openshift/cluster-ingress-operator/pkg/operator/controller"
"github.com/openshift/cluster-ingress-operator/pkg/operator/controller"
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Maybe import as operatorcontroller? We are inconsistent in how we import this package, and operatorcontroller is the least ambiguous of the options in use.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Agree, but not sure I agree with another round of CI for it...

@ironcladlou
Copy link
Contributor Author

/test e2e-azure-upgrade

@Miciah
Copy link
Contributor

Miciah commented Feb 17, 2020

/test e2e-upgrade-azure

@Miciah
Copy link
Contributor

Miciah commented Feb 18, 2020

/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Feb 18, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: ironcladlou, Miciah

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 478aedd into openshift:master Feb 18, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@ironcladlou: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged. Bugzilla bug 1770677 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

In response to this:

Bug 1770677: upstream the dnsrecord type

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/XL Denotes a PR that changes 500-999 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants