Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bug 1920421: Add "ingress.operator.openshift.io/hard-stop-after" annotation #538

Conversation

frobware
Copy link
Contributor

This is a manual back port of #522.

Annotating either an ingresscontroller or the ingress config with this
new annoation will redeploy the router and that will configure haproxy
to emit the haproxy "hard-stop-after" global option.

An ingresscontroller with a valid annotation set will override
ingresses.config/cluster (if set).

Examples:

Annotating the ingress config:

$ oc annotate ingresses.config/cluster ingress.operator.openshift.io/hard-stop-after=1h

Annotating the "default" ingresscontroller:

$ oc -n openshift-ingress-operator annotate ingresscontrollers/default ingress.operator.openshift.io/hard-stop-after=30m

Annotating either an ingresscontroller or the ingress config with this
new annoation will redeploy the router and that will configure haproxy
to emit the haproxy "hard-stop-after" global option.

An ingresscontroller with a valid annotation set will override
ingresses.config/cluster (if set).

Examples:

Annotating the ingress config:

    $ oc annotate ingresses.config/cluster ingress.operator.openshift.io/hard-stop-after=1h

Annotating the "default" ingresscontroller:

    $ oc -n openshift-ingress-operator annotate ingresscontrollers/default ingress.operator.openshift.io/hard-stop-after=30m
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added bugzilla/severity-urgent Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is urgent for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Jan 26, 2021
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@frobware: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1920421, which is invalid:

  • expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1918371 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), but it is ON_QA instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

Bug 1920421: Add "ingress.operator.openshift.io/hard-stop-after" annotation

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jan 26, 2021
@frobware frobware changed the title Bug 1920421: Add "ingress.operator.openshift.io/hard-stop-after" annotation Bug 1920423: Add "ingress.operator.openshift.io/hard-stop-after" annotation Jan 26, 2021
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@frobware: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1920423, which is invalid:

  • expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1918371 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), but it is ON_QA instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

Bug 1920423: Add "ingress.operator.openshift.io/hard-stop-after" annotation

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@frobware frobware changed the title Bug 1920423: Add "ingress.operator.openshift.io/hard-stop-after" annotation Bug 1920421: Add "ingress.operator.openshift.io/hard-stop-after" annotation Jan 26, 2021
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@frobware: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1920421, which is invalid:

  • expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1918371 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), but it is ON_QA instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

Bug 1920421: Add "ingress.operator.openshift.io/hard-stop-after" annotation

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@sgreene570
Copy link
Contributor

/retest
/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jan 26, 2021
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

Adjust hard-stop-after e2e test code to match the signature of
waitForIngressControllerCondition in release-4.5.
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jan 26, 2021
@sgreene570
Copy link
Contributor

e2e-tests compile now
/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jan 26, 2021
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: frobware, sgreene570

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

1 similar comment
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1920421, which is invalid:

  • expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1918371 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), but it is ON_QA instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. and removed bugzilla/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Jan 28, 2021
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1920421, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

6 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target release (4.5.z) matches configured target release for branch (4.5.z)
  • bug is in the state ASSIGNED, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)
  • dependent bug Bugzilla bug 1918371 is in the state VERIFIED, which is one of the valid states (VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA))
  • dependent Bugzilla bug 1918371 targets the "4.6.z" release, which is one of the valid target releases: 4.6.0, 4.6.z
  • bug has dependents

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@quarterpin
Copy link

/bugzilla cc-qa

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@quarterpin: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1920421, which is valid.

6 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target release (4.5.z) matches configured target release for branch (4.5.z)
  • bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)
  • dependent bug Bugzilla bug 1918371 is in the state VERIFIED, which is one of the valid states (VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA))
  • dependent Bugzilla bug 1918371 targets the "4.6.z" release, which is one of the valid target releases: 4.6.0, 4.6.z
  • bug has dependents

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @quarterpin

In response to this:

/bugzilla cc-qa

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@jwforres jwforres added the cherry-pick-approved Indicates a cherry-pick PR into a release branch has been approved by the release branch manager. label Jan 29, 2021
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

6 similar comments
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 524bb89 into openshift:release-4.5 Jan 30, 2021
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@frobware: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged:

Bugzilla bug 1920421 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

In response to this:

Bug 1920421: Add "ingress.operator.openshift.io/hard-stop-after" annotation

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. bugzilla/severity-urgent Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is urgent for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. cherry-pick-approved Indicates a cherry-pick PR into a release branch has been approved by the release branch manager. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

7 participants