Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[release-4.9] Bug 2097736: Fix loadBalancerServiceAnnotationsChanged check and update #786

Merged

Conversation

Miciah
Copy link
Contributor

@Miciah Miciah commented Jun 16, 2022

This is a manual cherry-pick of #783. #707 introduced a conflict that required resolution.

loadBalancerServiceAnnotationsChanged: Fix update

Fix loadBalancerServiceAnnotationsChanged to use the provided annotations argument when updating annotations. Before this change, loadBalancerServiceAnnotationsChanged used the annotations argument when checking whether annotations had changed, but then it used managedLoadBalancerServiceAnnotations when setting the annotations in the updated service object.

When checking whether the service is upgradeable for the purpose of setting the ingresscontroller's "Upgradeable" status condition, loadBalancerServiceTagsModified calls loadBalancerServiceAnnotationsChanged with an annotations argument that includes the "service.beta.kubernetes.io/aws-load-balancer-additional-resource-tags" annotation key, which is not in managedLoadBalancerServiceAnnotations. As a result, loadBalancerServiceAnnotationsChanged would report that the service was not upgradeable, but then the status condition message would not show that the "aws-load-balancer-additional-resource-tags" annotation had changed.

  • pkg/operator/controller/ingress/load_balancer_service.go (loadBalancerServiceAnnotationsChanged): Use the provided annotations argument instead of using managedLoadBalancerServiceAnnotations when updating annotations.
  • pkg/operator/controller/ingress/load_balancer_service_test.go (TestLoadBalancerServiceAnnotationsChanged): New test. Verify that loadBalancerServiceAnnotationsChanged behaves correctly when an unmanaged annotation is updated or when a managed annotation is added, updated, or deleted.

loadBalancerServiceAnnotationsChanged: Fix check

Fix loadBalancerServiceAnnotationsChanged to treat nil and empty annotations maps as equal. Before this commit, the comparison erroneously flagged an empty map and a nil map as unequal. As a result, the ingress operator could erroneously report that an ingresscontroller with a service with no annotations was not upgradeable.

  • pkg/operator/controller/ingress/load_balancer_service.go (loadBalancerServiceAnnotationsChanged): Use a for loop instead of go-cmp to check whether any managed annotations have changed.
  • pkg/operator/controller/ingress/load_balancer_service_test.go (TestLoadBalancerServiceAnnotationsChanged): Add test cases for empty/nil current/expected annotations.

Fix loadBalancerServiceAnnotationsChanged to use the provided "annotations"
argument when updating annotations.  Before this commit,
loadBalancerServiceAnnotationsChanged used the annotations argument when
checking whether annotations had changed, but then it used
managedLoadBalancerServiceAnnotations when setting the annotations in the
updated service object.

When checking whether the service is upgradeable for the purpose of setting
the ingresscontroller's "Upgradeable" status condition,
loadBalancerServiceTagsModified calls loadBalancerServiceAnnotationsChanged
with an annotations argument that includes the
"service.beta.kubernetes.io/aws-load-balancer-additional-resource-tags"
annotation key, which is not in managedLoadBalancerServiceAnnotations.  As
a result, loadBalancerServiceAnnotationsChanged would report that the
service was not upgradeable, but then the status condition message would
not show that the "aws-load-balancer-additional-resource-tags" annotation
had changed.

* pkg/operator/controller/ingress/load_balancer_service.go
(loadBalancerServiceAnnotationsChanged): Use the provided annotations
argument instead of using managedLoadBalancerServiceAnnotations when
updating annotations.
* pkg/operator/controller/ingress/load_balancer_service_test.go
(TestLoadBalancerServiceAnnotationsChanged): New test.  Verify that
loadBalancerServiceAnnotationsChanged behaves correctly when an unmanaged
annotation is updated or when a managed annotation is added, updated, or
deleted.
Fix loadBalancerServiceAnnotationsChanged to treat nil and empty
annotations maps as equal.  Before this commit, the comparison erroneously
flagged an empty map and a nil map as unequal.  As a result, the ingress
operator could erroneously report that an ingresscontroller with a service
with no annotations was not upgradeable.

This commit fixes bug 2097555.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2097555

* pkg/operator/controller/ingress/load_balancer_service.go
(loadBalancerServiceAnnotationsChanged): Use a for loop instead of go-cmp
to check whether any managed annotations have changed.
* pkg/operator/controller/ingress/load_balancer_service_test.go
(TestLoadBalancerServiceAnnotationsChanged): Add test cases for empty/nil
current/expected annotations.
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added bugzilla/severity-urgent Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is urgent for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Jun 16, 2022
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jun 16, 2022

@Miciah: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2097736, which is invalid:

  • expected dependent Bugzilla bug 2097735 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENTRELEASE), but it is ASSIGNED instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

[release-4.9] Bug 2097736: Fix loadBalancerServiceAnnotationsChanged check and update

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from frobware and knobunc June 16, 2022 21:31
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jun 16, 2022
@candita
Copy link
Contributor

candita commented Jun 16, 2022

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jun 16, 2022
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jun 16, 2022

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: candita, Miciah

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jun 17, 2022

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2097736, which is invalid:

  • expected dependent Bugzilla bug 2097735 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENTRELEASE), but it is POST instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jun 18, 2022

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2097736, which is invalid:

  • expected dependent Bugzilla bug 2097735 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENTRELEASE), but it is POST instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jun 19, 2022

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2097736, which is invalid:

  • expected dependent Bugzilla bug 2097735 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENTRELEASE), but it is POST instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jun 20, 2022

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2097736, which is invalid:

  • expected dependent Bugzilla bug 2097735 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENTRELEASE), but it is POST instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jun 21, 2022

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2097736, which is invalid:

  • expected dependent Bugzilla bug 2097735 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENTRELEASE), but it is POST instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jun 22, 2022

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2097736, which is invalid:

  • expected dependent Bugzilla bug 2097735 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENTRELEASE), but it is POST instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jun 23, 2022

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2097736, which is invalid:

  • expected dependent Bugzilla bug 2097735 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENTRELEASE), but it is POST instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@Miciah
Copy link
Contributor Author

Miciah commented Jun 23, 2022

/test e2e-aws-operator

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jun 23, 2022

@Miciah: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@Miciah
Copy link
Contributor Author

Miciah commented Jun 23, 2022

/label backport-risk-assessed

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the backport-risk-assessed Indicates a PR to a release branch has been evaluated and considered safe to accept. label Jun 23, 2022
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jun 27, 2022

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2097736, which is invalid:

  • expected dependent Bugzilla bug 2097735 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENTRELEASE), but it is POST instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@lihongan
Copy link
Contributor

/label cherry-pick-approved

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the cherry-pick-approved Indicates a cherry-pick PR into a release branch has been approved by the release branch manager. label Jun 27, 2022
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jun 28, 2022

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2097736, which is invalid:

  • expected dependent Bugzilla bug 2097735 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENTRELEASE), but it is POST instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jun 29, 2022

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2097736, which is invalid:

  • expected dependent Bugzilla bug 2097735 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENTRELEASE), but it is POST instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jun 30, 2022

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2097736, which is invalid:

  • expected dependent Bugzilla bug 2097735 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENTRELEASE), but it is POST instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jul 1, 2022

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2097736, which is invalid:

  • expected dependent Bugzilla bug 2097735 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENTRELEASE), but it is POST instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jul 2, 2022

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2097736, which is invalid:

  • expected dependent Bugzilla bug 2097735 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENTRELEASE), but it is POST instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jul 3, 2022

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2097736, which is invalid:

  • expected dependent Bugzilla bug 2097735 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENTRELEASE), but it is POST instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jul 4, 2022

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2097736, which is invalid:

  • expected dependent Bugzilla bug 2097735 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENTRELEASE), but it is POST instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jul 5, 2022

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2097736, which is invalid:

  • expected dependent Bugzilla bug 2097735 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENTRELEASE), but it is POST instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jul 6, 2022

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2097736, which is invalid:

  • expected dependent Bugzilla bug 2097735 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENTRELEASE), but it is POST instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@wking
Copy link
Member

wking commented Jul 6, 2022

/bugzilla refresh

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. and removed bugzilla/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Jul 6, 2022
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jul 6, 2022

@wking: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2097736, which is valid.

6 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target release (4.9.z) matches configured target release for branch (4.9.z)
  • bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)
  • dependent bug Bugzilla bug 2097735 is in the state VERIFIED, which is one of the valid states (VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENTRELEASE))
  • dependent Bugzilla bug 2097735 targets the "4.10.z" release, which is one of the valid target releases: 4.10.0, 4.10.z
  • bug has dependents

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @lihongan

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested a review from lihongan July 6, 2022 20:48
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot merged commit 9dbf3af into openshift:release-4.9 Jul 6, 2022
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jul 6, 2022

@Miciah: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged:

Bugzilla bug 2097736 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

In response to this:

[release-4.9] Bug 2097736: Fix loadBalancerServiceAnnotationsChanged check and update

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. backport-risk-assessed Indicates a PR to a release branch has been evaluated and considered safe to accept. bugzilla/severity-urgent Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is urgent for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. cherry-pick-approved Indicates a cherry-pick PR into a release branch has been approved by the release branch manager. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

8 participants