Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bug 1823934: Make default SCCs create-only by CVO #836

Merged

Conversation

tkashem
Copy link
Contributor

@tkashem tkashem commented Apr 17, 2020

No description provided.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@tkashem: No Bugzilla bug is referenced in the title of this pull request.
To reference a bug, add 'Bug XXX:' to the title of this pull request and request another bug refresh with /bugzilla refresh.

In response to this:

Bugzilla 1823934: Make default SCCs create-only by CVO

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@tkashem tkashem changed the title Bugzilla 1823934: Make default SCCs create-only by CVO Bug 1823934: Make default SCCs create-only by CVO Apr 17, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added bugzilla/severity-high Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is high for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Apr 17, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@tkashem: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1823934, which is invalid:

  • expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1823933 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), but it is MODIFIED instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

Bug 1823934: Make default SCCs create-only by CVO

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@tkashem
Copy link
Contributor Author

tkashem commented Apr 17, 2020

/retest

2 similar comments
@tkashem
Copy link
Contributor Author

tkashem commented Apr 17, 2020

/retest

@tkashem
Copy link
Contributor Author

tkashem commented Apr 17, 2020

/retest

@tkashem
Copy link
Contributor Author

tkashem commented Apr 17, 2020

/bugzilla refresh

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. label Apr 17, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@tkashem: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1823934, which is valid. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

6 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target release (4.4.0) matches configured target release for branch (4.4.0)
  • bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)
  • dependent bug Bugzilla bug 1823933 is in the state RELEASE_PENDING, which is one of the valid states (VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA))
  • dependent Bugzilla bug 1823933 targets the "4.5.0" release, which is one of the valid target releases: 4.5.0, 4.5.z
  • bug has dependents

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the bugzilla/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. label Apr 17, 2020
@mfojtik
Copy link
Member

mfojtik commented Apr 17, 2020

/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. labels Apr 17, 2020
@tkashem
Copy link
Contributor Author

tkashem commented Apr 17, 2020

/retest

@sttts
Copy link
Contributor

sttts commented Apr 17, 2020

/lgtm
/approve

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: mfojtik, sttts, tkashem

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@eparis eparis added the cherry-pick-approved Indicates a cherry-pick PR into a release branch has been approved by the release branch manager. label Apr 17, 2020
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit f5bf0b4 into openshift:release-4.4 Apr 17, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@tkashem: Some pull requests linked via external trackers have merged: . The following pull requests linked via external trackers have not merged:

In response to this:

Bug 1823934: Make default SCCs create-only by CVO

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. bugzilla/severity-high Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is high for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. cherry-pick-approved Indicates a cherry-pick PR into a release branch has been approved by the release branch manager. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

6 participants