Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Recovery controller #334

Merged
merged 4 commits into from Jan 27, 2020
Merged

Recovery controller #334

merged 4 commits into from Jan 27, 2020

Conversation

tnozicka
Copy link
Contributor

@tnozicka tnozicka commented Jan 8, 2020 •
edited

Adds kube-controller-manager-operator recovery-controller that manages CSR target signers and CA bundles so OpenShift can automatically recover from expired certs.

KCMO part of https://github.com/openshift/enhancements/blob/master/enhancements/kube-apiserver/auto-cert-recovery.md

Complements openshift/cluster-kube-apiserver-operator#635

Requires:

/cc @deads2k @sttts @soltysh @mfojtik

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. labels Jan 8, 2020
@tnozicka
Copy link
Contributor Author

tnozicka commented Jan 8, 2020

/retest

@tnozicka
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

@tnozicka tnozicka changed the title [WIP] - Recovery controller Recovery controller Jan 23, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Jan 23, 2020
@tnozicka tnozicka changed the title Recovery controller [WIP] Recovery controller Jan 23, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Jan 23, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added size/XXL Denotes a PR that changes 1000+ lines, ignoring generated files. needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. and removed size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Jan 23, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Jan 24, 2020
@tnozicka tnozicka force-pushed the recovery-controller branch 2 times, most recently from c7e193c to 32aa746 Compare January 24, 2020 12:50
@tnozicka tnozicka changed the title [WIP] Recovery controller Recovery controller Jan 24, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Jan 24, 2020
@soltysh
Copy link
Member

soltysh commented Jan 24, 2020

/retest

soltysh
soltysh approved these changes Jan 24, 2020
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@soltysh soltysh left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jan 24, 2020
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

1 similar comment
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

12 similar comments
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

2 similar comments
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jan 27, 2020
@tnozicka
Copy link
Contributor Author

bumped library-go again to get openshift/library-go#682, moved debug/prof to 9443 and added a reaction to openshift/library-go#681

@tnozicka
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

soltysh
soltysh approved these changes Jan 27, 2020
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@soltysh soltysh left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm
/retest

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jan 27, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: soltysh, tnozicka

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit b8c277d into openshift:master Jan 27, 2020
@tnozicka tnozicka deleted the recovery-controller branch January 27, 2020 20:19
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@soltysh soltysh soltysh approved these changes

@deads2k deads2k Awaiting requested review from deads2k

@mfojtik mfojtik Awaiting requested review from mfojtik

@sttts sttts Awaiting requested review from sttts

Assignees

@soltysh soltysh

Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/XXL Denotes a PR that changes 1000+ lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet
6 participants
@tnozicka @soltysh @openshift-bot @wking @openshift-ci-robot @openshift-merge-robot