Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bug 1806640: fix potential errors in Prometheus alerts #414

Merged
merged 1 commit into from May 14, 2020

Conversation

simonpasquier
Copy link
Contributor

There is no need to use the 'on' keyword to compare
kube_poddisruptionbudget_status_expected_pods and
kube_poddisruptionbudget_status_desired_healthy because both series have
the same label set. In addition when there are 2 instances of
kube-state-metrics running, it triggers evaluation errors in Prometheus.

To ensure that the expression returns one item per (namespace,
poddisruptionbudget) tuple, it is wrapped by the 'max' aggregation
operator.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the bugzilla/severity-low Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is low for the branch this PR is targeting. label May 12, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@simonpasquier: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1806640, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target release (4.5.0) matches configured target release for branch (4.5.0)
  • bug is in the state NEW, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)

In response to this:

Bug 1806640: fix potential errors in Prometheus alerts

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. label May 12, 2020
Copy link
Member

@soltysh soltysh left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Fix the nits and you're good to go.
/approve

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label May 13, 2020
There is no need to use the 'on' keyword to compare
kube_poddisruptionbudget_status_expected_pods and
kube_poddisruptionbudget_status_desired_healthy because both series have
the same label set. In addition when there are 2 instances of
kube-state-metrics running, it triggers evaluation errors in Prometheus.

To ensure that the expression returns one item per (namespace,
poddisruptionbudget) tuple, it is wrapped by the 'max' aggregation
operator.

Signed-off-by: Simon Pasquier <spasquie@redhat.com>
@simonpasquier
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

@mfojtik
Copy link
Member

mfojtik commented May 14, 2020

/retest
/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label May 14, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: mfojtik, simonpasquier, soltysh

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

3 similar comments
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit c539153 into openshift:master May 14, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@simonpasquier: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged: openshift/cluster-kube-controller-manager-operator#414. Bugzilla bug 1806640 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

In response to this:

Bug 1806640: fix potential errors in Prometheus alerts

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@simonpasquier simonpasquier deleted the bz-1806640 branch May 15, 2020 09:19
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. bugzilla/severity-low Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is low for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

6 participants