bug 1953707: Have olm.skipRange in csv correspond to search pattern in art.yaml

[ingvagabund]

olm.skipRange string has to match with a search pattern in art.yaml to
have it properly replaced with the right version

[openshift-ci-robot]

@ingvagabund: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1953707, which is invalid:

• expected the bug to target the "4.7.z" release, but it targets "---" instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

bug 1953707: Have olm.skipRange in csv correspond to search pattern in art.yaml

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[ingvagabund]

/bugzilla refresh

[openshift-ci-robot]

@ingvagabund: An error was encountered querying GitHub for users with public email (knarra@redhat.com) for bug 1953707 on the Bugzilla server at https://bugzilla.redhat.com. No known errors were detected, please see the full error message for details.

Full error message.

Post "http://ghproxy/graphql": dial tcp 172.30.229.2:80: connect: connection refused

Please contact an administrator to resolve this issue, then request a bug refresh with /bugzilla refresh.

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[damemi]

/lgtm

[openshift-ci-robot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: damemi, ingvagabund

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS [damemi,ingvagabund]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[openshift-bot]

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

[openshift-ci-robot]

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1953707, which is invalid:

• expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1943224 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENTRELEASE), but it is ON_QA instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[openshift-bot]

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

[openshift-ci-robot]

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1953707, which is invalid:

• expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1943224 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENTRELEASE), but it is ON_QA instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[openshift-bot]

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

[openshift-ci-robot]

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1953707, which is invalid:

• expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1943224 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENTRELEASE), but it is ON_QA instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[openshift-bot]

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

[openshift-ci-robot]

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1953707, which is invalid:

• expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1943224 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENTRELEASE), but it is ON_QA instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[openshift-bot]

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

[openshift-ci-robot]

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1953707, which is invalid:

• expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1943224 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENTRELEASE), but it is ON_QA instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[openshift-bot]

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

[openshift-ci-robot]

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1953707, which is invalid:

• expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1943224 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENTRELEASE), but it is ON_QA instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[openshift-bot]

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

[openshift-ci-robot]

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1953707, which is invalid:

• expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1943224 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENTRELEASE), but it is ON_QA instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[openshift-bot]

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

[openshift-ci-robot]

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1953707, which is valid.

6 validation(s) were run on this bug

• bug is open, matching expected state (open)
• bug target release (4.7.z) matches configured target release for branch (4.7.z)
• bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)
• dependent bug Bugzilla bug 1943224 is in the state VERIFIED, which is one of the valid states (VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENTRELEASE))
• dependent Bugzilla bug 1943224 targets the "4.8.0" release, which is one of the valid target releases: 4.8.0
• bug has dependents

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @kasturinarra

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[openshift-ci]

@ingvagabund: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged:

• openshift/cluster-kube-descheduler-operator#189

Bugzilla bug 1953707 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

In response to this:

bug 1953707: Have olm.skipRange in csv correspond to search pattern in art.yaml

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.