Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

OCPBUGS-13579: Bump minKubeVersion to 1.27 #299

Merged

Conversation

ingvagabund
Copy link
Member

SSIA

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Jun 19, 2023
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@ingvagabund: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-13579, which is invalid:

  • expected the bug to be in one of the following states: NEW, ASSIGNED, POST, but it is ON_QA instead

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

In response to this:

SSIA

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@ingvagabund
Copy link
Member Author

/jira refresh

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jun 19, 2023
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. and removed jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Jun 19, 2023
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@ingvagabund: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-13579, which is valid.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target version (4.14.0) matches configured target version for branch (4.14.0)
  • bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @kasturinarra

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested a review from kasturinarra June 19, 2023 10:23
@atiratree
Copy link
Member

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jun 19, 2023
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD b52bf63 and 2 for PR HEAD dd0737c in total

@ingvagabund
Copy link
Member Author

ingvagabund commented Jun 19, 2023

I0619 12:07:04.616515   10295 operator_test.go:218] Descheduler (operand) pod running in descheduler-7688bf94cd-cfx49
--- FAIL: TestDescheduling (60.50s)
    ...
    operator_test.go:389: Pod test-descheduler-operator-pod-7bc7bff7f-cnknn not running yet, is Pending instead
    operator_test.go:389: Pod test-descheduler-operator-pod-7bc7bff7f-cnknn not running yet, is Pending instead
I0619 12:08:02.075635       1 schedule_one.go:252] "Successfully bound pod to node" pod="e2e-testdescheduling/test-descheduler-operator-pod-7bc7bff7f-cnknn" node="ip-10-0-183-55.us-west-1.compute.internal" evaluatedNodes=6 feasibleNodes=3

looks like it just took longer to schedule the pod

@ingvagabund
Copy link
Member Author

/retest-required

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jun 19, 2023
@ingvagabund
Copy link
Member Author

/retest-required

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jun 27, 2023

@ingvagabund: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@atiratree
Copy link
Member

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jun 27, 2023
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jun 27, 2023

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: atiratree, ingvagabund

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 5627cef into openshift:master Jun 27, 2023
5 checks passed
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@ingvagabund: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-13579: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged:

Jira Issue OCPBUGS-13579 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

In response to this:

SSIA

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@ingvagabund ingvagabund deleted the bump-csv-version branch June 27, 2023 12:06
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants