Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rebase to kube 1.18 #226

Merged
merged 2 commits into from Mar 25, 2020
Merged

Conversation

damemi
Copy link

@damemi damemi commented Mar 16, 2020

No description provided.

@damemi
Copy link
Author

damemi commented Mar 16, 2020

/hold
this is currently a POC based on the prebase branches that have merged in library-go, api, and client-go

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. labels Mar 16, 2020
Copy link
Member

@soltysh soltysh left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Two nits, but you need to also fix the operator tests which currently fail compilation.

go.mod Outdated
k8s.io/klog v1.0.0
)

replace github.com/jteeuwen/go-bindata => github.com/jteeuwen/go-bindata v3.0.8-0.20151023091102-a0ff2567cfb7+incompatible

replace github.com/openshift/api => github.com/openshift/api v0.0.0-20200311151921-fdf269f98861
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm surprised this is here, we should not have to replace those, it should pick the correct ones from library-go deps, so just update the ones in require directive.

@@ -48,3 +48,7 @@ func (m *configMetrics) Collect(ch chan<- prometheus.Metric) {
ch <- g
}
}

func (m *configMetrics) FQName() string {
return "cluster_master_schedulable"
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Maybe worth making this a constant rather than repeating it in two places?

@damemi
Copy link
Author

damemi commented Mar 16, 2020

Currently pushed with the changes from openshift/library-go#748 in my fork of library-go, need that to get in to the prebase branch

@damemi
Copy link
Author

damemi commented Mar 16, 2020

/retest

7 similar comments
@damemi
Copy link
Author

damemi commented Mar 17, 2020

/retest

@ingvagabund
Copy link
Member

/retest

@ingvagabund
Copy link
Member

/retest

@damemi
Copy link
Author

damemi commented Mar 17, 2020

/retest

@damemi
Copy link
Author

damemi commented Mar 17, 2020

/retest

@damemi
Copy link
Author

damemi commented Mar 17, 2020

/retest

@ingvagabund
Copy link
Member

/retest

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Mar 19, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Mar 19, 2020
@damemi damemi force-pushed the rebase-1.18 branch 2 times, most recently from aea3ac1 to 7e32d75 Compare March 19, 2020 20:20
@damemi
Copy link
Author

damemi commented Mar 23, 2020

/hold cancel

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Mar 23, 2020
@damemi
Copy link
Author

damemi commented Mar 23, 2020

/retest

2 similar comments
@damemi
Copy link
Author

damemi commented Mar 23, 2020

/retest

@damemi
Copy link
Author

damemi commented Mar 23, 2020

/retest

Copy link
Member

@soltysh soltysh left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm
/approve

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

13 similar comments
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@damemi
Copy link
Author

damemi commented Mar 24, 2020

/hold

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Mar 24, 2020
@damemi
Copy link
Author

damemi commented Mar 24, 2020

Reverted 630f2e5 to see if that's breaking tests

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Mar 24, 2020
@soltysh
Copy link
Member

soltysh commented Mar 24, 2020

Reverted 630f2e5 to see if that's breaking tests

That'd be surprising but let's see 🤷‍♂️

@damemi
Copy link
Author

damemi commented Mar 24, 2020

/retest
I think that switch to k8smetrics was breaking it. The cluster was failing with some weird logs around prometheus that pointed to the area where we register that metric.

@damemi
Copy link
Author

damemi commented Mar 24, 2020

/hold cancel
I think using the old metrics is still fine, but would like to switch at some point so we can inherit those methods

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Mar 24, 2020
Copy link
Member

@soltysh soltysh left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm
/approve
/retest

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Mar 25, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: damemi, soltysh

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

2 similar comments
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 01caed9 into openshift:master Mar 25, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

6 participants